Le Manteau De Neige Dans Les Forêts De Hongrie

Salamin, Petrus Pius

doi:10.1080/02626665909493143

Cited by 1 publication

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

Section: The Anatomy Of Bark-water Interactionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…bark microrelief has long been known to enable the adhesion of large ice deposits to branches, stems, and exposed tree roots (Klamerus-Iwan et al, 2020a) -even creating "champignons de neige" (snow mushrooms) on the bark of stumps (see photographs 2-6 in Salamin, 1959). Interestingly, Salamin (1959) discusses the effect of outer bark roughness on the mode of snow interception, saying that "on the trunks of trees with smooth bark, it is deposited in a narrow band [whereas] on trunks with very rough bark, it is stored in a heap with great adhesive power 1 ." Intercepted snow may remain on the bark until air temperatures warm (inducing melt) or a mechanical force (like wind) redistributes it; however, the outer bark's albedo can play a role in initiating snowmelt in the canopy even under freezing conditions (Levia and Underwood, 2004).…”

Section: The Anatomy Of Bark-water Interactionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Translated from French on page 53 ofSalamin (1959): "sur le tronc des arbres à écorce lisse, elle se dépose en bande étroite. sur les troncs dont l'écorce est fortement rugueuse, elle se conserve en tas ayant un grand pouvoir adhésif.…”

unclassified

See 2 more Smart Citations

Bark-Water Interactions Across Ecosystem States and Fluxes

Stan

Dymond

Klamerus‐Iwan

2021

Front. For. Glob. Change

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To date, the perspective of forest ecohydrologists has heavily focused on leaf-water interactions – leaving the ecohydrological roles of bark under-studied, oversimplified, or omitted from the forest water cycle. Of course, the lack of study, oversimplification, or omission of processes is not inherently problematic to advancing ecohydrological theory or operational practice. Thus, this perspective outlines the relevance of bark-water interactions to advancing ecohydrological theory and practice: (i) across scales (by briefly examining the geography of bark); (ii) across ecosystem compartments (i.e., living and dead bark on canopies, stems, and in litter layers); and, thereby, (iii) across all major hydrologic states and fluxes in forests (providing estimates and contexts where available in the scant literature). The relevance of bark-water interactions to biogeochemical aspects of forest ecosystems is also highlighted, like canopy-soil nutrient exchanges and soil properties. We conclude that a broad ecohydrological perspective of bark-water interactions is currently merited.

show abstract

Section: The Anatomy Of Bark-water Interactionsmentioning

confidence: 99%