“…Abraham (1920/1973), Bergler (1947), Fenichel (1945), Gitelson (1948/1973), and Jones (1948) soon adopted more moderate viewpoints than Freud’s and Ferenczi’s. But since the end of the 1970s, mostly in France, Canada, and the United States, communications and written analytical papers were written on this matter (Abraham, Kocher, & Goda, 1980; Andreoli & Quartier, 1976; Assoun, 1983; Balbo, 1980, 1982; Balier, 1976, 1979, 1982; Bergeret, 1982; Bianchi, 1978, 1980a, 1980b, 1982a, 1982b, 1983a, 1983b, 1985, 1987, 1989, 1999; Charazac, 1983, 1989, 1998a, 1998b, 2001, 2002, 2005, 2008, 2010; Clerk, 1995; Dedieu-Anglade, 1981; Gagey, 1983, 1989; Guillaumin, 1982; Herfray, 1984; Janin, 1982; Le Gouès, 1984, 1991, 2000; Péruchon, 1987, 1993, 1999; Pollock, 1982; Quinodoz, 1987, 1994, 1997; Simeone, 1988; Verdon, 2003, 2004a, 2004b, 2007a, 2007b, 2011a; Villa, 2010; Wertheimer, 1982). These works mainly deal with narcissistic wounds and the predominance of castration anxiety, regression processes, tensions between the ego and the ideal ego, the revival of “œdipal conflicts,” investment by reliance on the object, and so on.…”