Leader Charges, Currents, Ambient Electric Fields, and Space Charges Along Downward Positive Leader Paths Retrieved From Ground Measurements in Metropolis

Abstract

An approach for retrieving the leader channel charge density, leader current, ambient electric field, and space charge along a leader channel path from ground observations with a complicated ground condition was presented. With this approach, properties of two downward positive leaders (DPL1 and DPL2) struck at high-rise buildings were studied based on electric and optical measurements made on the roof of a 100 m high building in Guangzhou, China. It shows that the leader-produced electric field on the roof of the 100 m high building was about 4 times of that on flat ground. The 2-D speed for both leaders showed a general increasing trend as the leader going down, in the range of 1.8 to 32.3 × 10 5 and 1.7 to 46.9 × 10 5 m/s, respectively. The channel line charge density for both leaders showed firstly a sharp increasing trend and then a decreasing trend as the leader going down, in the range of 0.4 to 8.6 and 0.4 to 15.2 mC/m, respectively. The current of the two leaders varied in the range of 0.7 to 5.4 and 0.7 to 4.6 kA, respectively. The ambient electric field (downward is positive) for both leaders showed an alternating polarity along the leader path, in the range of −120 to +176 and −250 to +180 kV/m, respectively. The space charge for both leaders showed also an alternating polarity along the leader path, in the range of −12.3 to +4.2 and −13.9 to +7.8 nC/m 3 , respectively, which may reflect the in-cloud electric structure and the corona charge distribution between the cloud and ground.

On the Initiation of Upward Negative Lightning by Nearby Lightning Activity: An Analytical Approach

“…Physics sign convention for the electric field was used in this paper (upward directed field is positive). It is worth noting that here we present a limited number of cases that are representative of common processes, having in mind uncertainties in input variables, including the input geometry, line charge density (e.g., Gao et al., 2020; Shen et al., 2019) and velocity of leaders (e.g., Campos et al., 2014; Proctor, 1997). An open‐source code with a graphical interface is provided as supporting information.…”

Observation and Modeling of Dart Leader Development in an Altitude‐Triggered Lightning Flash

“…Gao et al. (2020) reported the charge densities of the two dart leaders ranged from 0.4 to 15.2 mC/m. Lalande et al.…”

Estimating the Electric Fields Driving Lightning Dart Leader Development with BIMAP-3D Observations

“…The model of Kasemir (1960) has historically been referred to as the bidirectional leader model, we will instead refer to it as the equipotential leader model, since the equipotential assumption is the most significant difference between this model and other non-physics-based leader models. A number of studies have used measured field changes to model simple charge configurations along leader channels without considering leader conductivity (Cai et al, 2022;Chen et al, 2013;Gao et al, 2020;Jensen et al, 2023b;Karunarathne et al, 2015;Lu et al, 2011). By contrast relatively few studies have attempted to compare the equipotential model to observed electric field changes associated with lightning (Mazur & Ruhnke, 1993;Pasko, 2014;da Silva & Pasko, 2015), and these studies have been somewhat limited by lack of knowledge of the extent or location of the leader channel.…”