1966
DOI: 10.1016/0028-3932(66)90028-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning and limbic lesions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
116
3

Year Published

1968
1968
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 370 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
11
116
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This idea is an extension of earlier theoretical notions that the amygdala is involved in the interpretation and integration of reinforcement (Weiskrantz, 1956), serves as a reinforcement register (Douglas & Pribram, 1966), mediates stimulus-reinforcement associations (Jones & Mishkin, 1972) and serves to associate stimuli with reward value (Gaffan, 1992). …”
Section: Short-term or Working Memory --Affect Attributementioning
confidence: 79%
“…This idea is an extension of earlier theoretical notions that the amygdala is involved in the interpretation and integration of reinforcement (Weiskrantz, 1956), serves as a reinforcement register (Douglas & Pribram, 1966), mediates stimulus-reinforcement associations (Jones & Mishkin, 1972) and serves to associate stimuli with reward value (Gaffan, 1992). …”
Section: Short-term or Working Memory --Affect Attributementioning
confidence: 79%
“…Later on, this attentional control was proposed to underlie the psychological function of internal inhibition (Douglas, 1972;Douglas & Pribram, 1966;Kimble, 1968). The internal inhibition hypotheses find serious difficulties in the fact that hippocampal ablations do not affect the formation of conditioned inhibition when training consisted of a stimulus A, always reinforced, interspersed with stimuli A and B, always nonreinforced (Solomon, 1977).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, animals with hippocampal lesions would behave like normals in acquisition, conditioned inhibition, latent learning, passive avoidance, and retrograde memory tasks, to the extent that inhibition of the orienting response is not involved in these tasks. Douglas and Pribram (1%6), Kimble (1968), and Douglas (1972): Attentional Control and Internal Inhibition Douglas and Pribram (1966) proposed that the hippocampus excluded stimuli from attention through efferent control of sensory reception. This control would inhibit the reception of stimuli that have been associated with nonreinforcement, constituting a restatement of Pavlov's (1927) internal inhibition in attentional terms (Douglas, 1967).…”
Section: Theories Involving Attentional Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations