2018
DOI: 10.1590/1982-4327e2810
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning by Exclusion in Toddlers

Abstract: Children of different ages respond by exclusion in trials of auditory-visual conditional discriminations. However, the learning of these relations can depend on a variety of factors, such as age, vocabulary size and amount of exposure to the emerging relation. The present study assessed learning by exclusion in children aged between 16 and 24 months, using learning probes with and without mask that required either selection or rejection topographies. Familiar word-object conditional discriminations were taught… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0
7

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
2
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, seven of the eight errors in the learning 4 probes were choices of Undefi ned 3 or Undefi ned 4. Similar results were observed in other studies with children of the same age (e.g., Ribeiro de Souza et al, 2018;Schmidt et al, 2016) and corroborated the evidence that control by novelty exerts infl uence on the patterns of choice of children in analogous tasks (Horst et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similarly, seven of the eight errors in the learning 4 probes were choices of Undefi ned 3 or Undefi ned 4. Similar results were observed in other studies with children of the same age (e.g., Ribeiro de Souza et al, 2018;Schmidt et al, 2016) and corroborated the evidence that control by novelty exerts infl uence on the patterns of choice of children in analogous tasks (Horst et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…when the sample is presented again, the subject may choose a different stimulus, in its presence). Especially in relation to learning of words or of auditory-visual relationship (e.g., name-object or name-fi gure), recent studies with small children (aged 18 to 36 months) have indicated that a single exposure to exclusion trials is rarely suffi cient for the participants to learn the new relation (Domeniconi, Costa, de Souza, & de Rose, 2007;Horst & Samuelson, 2008;Ribeiro de Souza, Gil, & Garcia, 2018;Ribeiro de Souza, Minto de Sousa, & Gil, 2016;Schmidt, Franco, Lotério, & Gomes, 2016).…”
Section: Pruebas De Discriminación En La Evaluación Del Aprendizaje Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Anotamos, para um leitor talvez interessado, que avaliamos número de tentativas por sessão, duração de sessão, tamanho dos estímulos, tipos de aparato, valor reforçador dos estímulos, o valor reforçador das respostas do experimentador etc. (Faleiros, Canhedo, Sousa, Oliveira & Gil, 2005;Gil et al, 2006;Oliveira & Gil, 2008 Gil, & Garcia, 2018a;2018b). No caso de objetos de uso da criança em casa, os pais eram os informantes (Garcia, 2010, Sertori, 2017.…”
unclassified
“…Apesar da literatura referir que a aprendizagem de novas palavras tem estreita relação com o responder por exclusão, diversos estudos têm demonstrado que um número reduzido de exposições a tentativas de responder por exclusão não é suficiente para que ocorra a aprendizagem de novas relações palavra-objeto (Domeniconi, Costa, de Rose, & de Souza, 2007;Schmidt, Franco, Lotério, & Gomes, 2016;Souza, Gil, & Garcia, 2018;Souza, Sousa, & Gil, 2016;Wilkinson & McIlvane, 1997). Porém, a exposição repetida a tentativas similares às de responder por exclusão pode favorecer essa aprendizagem, mesmo em crianças com menos de 36 meses (Costa, Grisante, Domeniconi, de Rose, & de Souza, 2013;Souza et al, 2016).…”
unclassified