2021
DOI: 10.1109/lra.2021.3111962
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning Deep Energy Shaping Policies for Stability-Guaranteed Manipulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Policies for Stability-Guaranteed Manipulation [190] The traditional stability analysis of DRL becomes difficult due to the uninterpretable nature of neural network policies and unknown system dynamics.…”
Section: Learning Deep Energy Shapingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Policies for Stability-Guaranteed Manipulation [190] The traditional stability analysis of DRL becomes difficult due to the uninterpretable nature of neural network policies and unknown system dynamics.…”
Section: Learning Deep Energy Shapingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Performance improvement spans different domains although research generally focuses on accuracy [15], safety [16], robustness [17], and contact stability [18]. Other studies, such as [19,20], analyzed stability from a different perspective considering that any state trajectory must be bounded and tend to the target position required by the task. For this purpose, the authors shaped the exploration of the RL agent with a Lyapunov function.…”
Section: Contact-rich Manipulation Tasks: Assembly and Disassemblymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, our proposed method based on free parameterizations provides the same scalability as GNNs without imposing any constraints on the weight matrices to guarantee closed-loop stability. Although previous work explored stable-by-design control based on mechanical energy conservation [34], [35], these methods are limited to specific systems (e.g., SE(3) dynamics). On the other hand, our approach applies to a wider range of nonlinear systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%