Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics - COLING '08 2008
DOI: 10.3115/1599081.1599188
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning entailment rules for unary templates

Abstract: Most work on unsupervised entailment rule acquisition focused on rules between templates with two variables, ignoring unary rules -entailment rules between templates with a single variable. In this paper we investigate two approaches for unsupervised learning of such rules and compare the proposed methods with a binary rule learning method. The results show that the learned unary rule-sets outperform the binary rule-set. In addition, a novel directional similarity measure for learning entailment, termed Balanc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
72
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Balprec is a measure created by Szpektor and Dagan (2008). They proposed combining WeedsPrec together with the Lin measure by taking their geometric average.…”
Section: Similarity Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Balprec is a measure created by Szpektor and Dagan (2008). They proposed combining WeedsPrec together with the Lin measure by taking their geometric average.…”
Section: Similarity Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given context vectors, Lin and Pantel (2001) used a symmetric similarity metric (Lin, 1998) to find candidate paraphrases. We build dependency context vectors for each word in our data and compute both symmetric as well as more recently proposed asymmetric similarity measures (Weeds et al, 2004;Szpektor and Dagan, 2008;Clarke, 2009), which are potentially better suited for identifying A paraphrases. Table 3 gives a comparison of the pairs which are considered "most similar" according to several of these metrics.…”
Section: Monolingual Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, they calculate the synonymy between two relations by comparing the arguments with which they occur. Several methods have been proposed [30,31,52,49,54], which differ in the representation of the predicates, the extracted features and the function used to compute the similarity of the feature vectors. To be effective, distributional metrics must rely on some weighting scheme over the relation features.…”
Section: Synonym Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%