2013
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9752.12020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning from Others

Abstract: John McDowell begins his essay ‘Knowledge by Hearsay’ (1993) by describing two ways language matters to epistemology. The first is that, by understanding and accepting someone else's utterance, a person can acquire knowledge. This is what philosophers call ‘knowledge by testimony’. The second is that children acquire knowledge in the course of learning their first language—in acquiring language, a child inherits a conception of the world. In The Formation of Reason (2011), and my writings on Russian socio‐hist… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We do not, as Elizabeth Anscombe puts it, ‘hope that our pupils believe us , but rather, that they will come to see that what we say is true—if it is’ (Anscombe, 1979, p. 145). Similarly, he draws on arguments from Benjamin McMyler (2011) and Richard Moran (2006) to the effect that a distinction is to be drawn between ‘ telling someone that p and arguing that p ’ (Bakhurst, 2013, p. 198). In the former case, the speaker asks her audience to believe her , whereas in the latter, the audience is asked to attend to reasons or evidence for believing that p .…”
Section: The Epistemological Sense Of Testimonymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We do not, as Elizabeth Anscombe puts it, ‘hope that our pupils believe us , but rather, that they will come to see that what we say is true—if it is’ (Anscombe, 1979, p. 145). Similarly, he draws on arguments from Benjamin McMyler (2011) and Richard Moran (2006) to the effect that a distinction is to be drawn between ‘ telling someone that p and arguing that p ’ (Bakhurst, 2013, p. 198). In the former case, the speaker asks her audience to believe her , whereas in the latter, the audience is asked to attend to reasons or evidence for believing that p .…”
Section: The Epistemological Sense Of Testimonymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the students are not to believe her , they are to believe the discipline. The teacher is there to present what is believed and why, and only incidentally to say what she thinks (see Bakhurst, 2013, p. 198). But in response to the criticism that this downplays the influence of the teacher's personality on her ability as a teacher, he now prefers, with Rödl, to see the teacher as an embodiment, or personification, of her discipline.…”
Section: The Epistemological Sense Of Testimonymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It should be noted that nothing important here turns material adequacy of a further epistemological doctrine associated with McDowell's epistemology, and also embraced by Bakhurst—namely, McDowell's epistemological disjunctivism about perceptual knowledge (see, for example, McDowell, 1995; Bakhurst, 2013 and 2018). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…may cause those conclusions to be false . I should here acknowledge David Bakhurst (, pp. 192–193), who chastises me for claiming that it is our beliefs or claims, rather than we ourselves, that are fallible.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%