2012
DOI: 10.1037/a0025578
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning to ignore distracters.

Abstract: Eyetracking has indicated that older and young adults process distracters similarly when reading single sentences. The present study extended this approach by presenting short paragraphs sentence by sentence. Eyetracking measures included reading times per word, and the duration of the first fixation and total fixations to the distracters and target words. Comprehension was tested following each paragraph and recognition of distracters and target words was assessed. The results indicated that young adults were… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The aim of these models was to test the effects of age on relative clause attachment processing, collapsing across potential individual differences in working memory and language experience. In the second (Model 2) and third sets (Model 3) of models, we tested the moderating influence of individual differences in verbal working memory and print exposure, respectively 9 (see Traxler, 2007; Rozek, Kemper, & McDowd, 2012; Payne et al, 2012 for similar analytical plans). Separate models were fit to reading times in the reflexive pronoun and post-disambiguating region in order to test for the effects of working memory and print exposure, by including these predictors in their respective models, and allowing them to moderate the sentence-type contrasts (i.e., two-way interactions) and the age × sentence-type contrast interactions (i.e., three-way interactions).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim of these models was to test the effects of age on relative clause attachment processing, collapsing across potential individual differences in working memory and language experience. In the second (Model 2) and third sets (Model 3) of models, we tested the moderating influence of individual differences in verbal working memory and print exposure, respectively 9 (see Traxler, 2007; Rozek, Kemper, & McDowd, 2012; Payne et al, 2012 for similar analytical plans). Separate models were fit to reading times in the reflexive pronoun and post-disambiguating region in order to test for the effects of working memory and print exposure, by including these predictors in their respective models, and allowing them to moderate the sentence-type contrasts (i.e., two-way interactions) and the age × sentence-type contrast interactions (i.e., three-way interactions).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the line of our results for WM capacity, deficits in storage capacity have been suggested as one of the possible explanations for aging impairments in WM (Bopp & Verhaeghen, 2005). An alternative to this theory is the inhibition deficit theory (Hasher & Zacks, 1988), according to which older adults show deficits not because their WM capacity is reduced, but because as individuals age they find it increasingly difficult to manage irrelevant information (e.g., Rozek, Kemper, & McDowd, 2012; Verhaeghen, 2011). Likewise, it has been well documented that short-term memory decline in older adulthood (Hale et al., 2011; Verhaegen et al., 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may, therefore, serve as a distraction that disrupts normal reading performance rather than a baseline condition in which access to parafoveal information is restricted. As considerable evidence suggests older adults suffer more from distraction than young adults [85][86][87], they may be more affected by these masks. Consequently, while research on adult age differences in perceptual span effects currently is inconclusive, a way ahead may be to consider more carefully potential age differences in the effects of different types of foveal and parafoveal masks.…”
Section: Aging Effects On the Perceptual Spanmentioning
confidence: 99%