1982
DOI: 10.1080/00222216.1982.11969511
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leisure Activities and Perceived Risk

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
0
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
54
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several researches have adopted five dimensions of perceived risk that identified by Jacoby andKaplan (1972): Financial Risk, Performance Risk, Physical Risk, Social Risk, andPsychological Risk (Cheron andRitchie, 1982;Mitra, Reiss and Capella, 1999;Stone and Gronhaug, 1993;Stone and Mason, 1995). At the latest study, Roselius (1971) adds one more dimension to the literature as called 'time risk'.…”
Section: Dimensions Of Perceived Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several researches have adopted five dimensions of perceived risk that identified by Jacoby andKaplan (1972): Financial Risk, Performance Risk, Physical Risk, Social Risk, andPsychological Risk (Cheron andRitchie, 1982;Mitra, Reiss and Capella, 1999;Stone and Gronhaug, 1993;Stone and Mason, 1995). At the latest study, Roselius (1971) adds one more dimension to the literature as called 'time risk'.…”
Section: Dimensions Of Perceived Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This work draws on the wider consumer behaviour literature which has identified seven main types of risk (Schiffman & Kanuk, 1991): financial, functional or performance, physical, social, psychological, satisfaction and time. Pioneer research by Cheron & Ritchie (1982), Roehl & Fesenmeier (1992) and others drew on such models to identify similar forms of risk in tourism and travel contexts. The classification of types of risks has been revised and refined over time, with Sönmez & Graefe (1998a), for example, summarizing these in terms of four main types of risk in tourism: financial, psychological, satisfaction, and time risks.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estes fatores fisiológicos do estímulo do pra zer têm sido discutidos profusamente por vários autores (Neulinger, 1981;McCabe, 2000; Walle, 1997). A motivação associada ao risco nas experiências de aventura é um tema extremamente vasto e complexo (Cheron & Brent, 1982), que vai além dos objetivos do presente trabalho. A presente análise estará centrada fundamen talmente nas definições do risco e nas formas adequadas de seu gerenciamento.…”
unclassified