“…Higher mesophotic abundances of some groups, and changes in predator communities is a potential indicator of depth refugia (Thresher and Colin, 1986;Bejarano et al, 2014;Andradi-Brown et al, 2016;Lindfield et al, 2016), particularly for the fishery-depleted target species that were more abundant in mesophotic depths (e.g., A. virescens, Caranx ignobilis, Figures 8D, 10), or for redatory species with larger mesophotic body sizes (e.g., C. melampygus, Figure 9C). Given that assessments of MHI reef fish stock exploitation rates and annual catch assignments remain largely constrained to fishery-independent, open-circuit diver depths (i.e., <30 m) or fisheries-dependent, commercial catch/recreational survey data obtained from indeterminate depths (Nadon et al, 2015), the use of BRUVS serves as a promising, shallower compliment to the deep-water camera system (BotCam) utilized for Hawaiian bottom fish stock assessments (Merritt et al, 2011). Finally, additional research parsing depth refugia vs. ontogeny effects in structuring reef fish communities would be beneficial, as largersized mesophotic planktivores ( Figure 9B) could be attributed to ontogenic migrations (Andradi-Brown et al, 2016) and may be less prone to mesophotic predation in lower-complexity habitats that do not provide adequate shelter to more vulnerable size classes.…”