2011
DOI: 10.5565/rev/jtl3.446
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Les connaissances implicites et explicites en grammaire : quelle importance pour l’enseignement? Quelles conséquences?

Abstract: Cet article présente une synthèse des recherches en psychologie cognitive sur les connaissances implicites et explicites et leur mode d'apprentissage du point de vue de la didactique du français écrit, particulièrement pour l'enseignement de l'orthographe grammaticale, afin d'en extraire les conséquences pour l'enseignement. Des exercices de grammaire dans du matériel scolaire sont ensuite analysés sous cet angle pour déterminer à quel point ils permettent de préparer l'élève à la maitrise de la morphographie … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
19

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
10
0
19
Order By: Relevance
“…Some concepts elaborated within formal sentence‐based models (e.g., complementary distribution, noun phrase, hierarchy, left‐dislocation) may form microsystems that are adequate to help students disentangle sentence‐level issues in writing (e.g., silent agreements in French, cf. Nadeau and Fisher ). Other concepts further expanded within lexical approaches to syntax (e.g., double‐object construction) can help students explore the concept of transitivity (which may be useful in exploring the use of certain pronouns, e.g., in a bilingual Catalan‐Spanish setting, cf.…”
Section: Reflexivity and Metalinguistic Activity In Language Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some concepts elaborated within formal sentence‐based models (e.g., complementary distribution, noun phrase, hierarchy, left‐dislocation) may form microsystems that are adequate to help students disentangle sentence‐level issues in writing (e.g., silent agreements in French, cf. Nadeau and Fisher ). Other concepts further expanded within lexical approaches to syntax (e.g., double‐object construction) can help students explore the concept of transitivity (which may be useful in exploring the use of certain pronouns, e.g., in a bilingual Catalan‐Spanish setting, cf.…”
Section: Reflexivity and Metalinguistic Activity In Language Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some lines of research of a qualitative nature have enabled the pointing out of ways towards a possible answer. On the one hand, research on students' grammatical concepts demonstrates the inconsistency and lack of systematization of the concepts that students elaborate (e.g., Casas, 2014; and see for similar results Myhill, 2000in the UK, and Fisher, 2004and Nadeau & Fisher, 2011. This lack of systematicity would be closely related to the formulations of textbooks that teachers and students use as guides to learn grammar, and, for instance, would manifest itself in tasks of identification (Coronas, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Le statut du vocabulaire grammatical dans l'enseignement pose la question du rapport entre enseignement implicite et enseignement explicite de la langue. Nadeau et Fisher (2011) montrent ainsi en analysant des manuels de grammaire québécois que les exercices proposés font régulièrement appel à des connaissances implicites. Elles font le constat que la limite entre connaissances implicites et connaissances explicites est souvent mal maitrisée, ce qui met en difficulté les élèves ne possédant pas les connaissances implicites nécessaires.…”
Section: La Nécessité D'une Approche Réflexive De La Langueunclassified