2004
DOI: 10.47678/cjhe.v34i3.183464
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Less State, More Market: University Reform in Canada and Abroad

Abstract: Political, economic, and social explanations of higher education reform, and the very definition of "reform," are the main departure points of this volume. The introduction uses the examples of Canada, Austria, Germany, and Japan to show that in all these countries, reform has meant reduced state funding and control and increased reliance on market mechanisms, private sources of funding, and new forms of university governance and management.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Jones (2004) charted and assessed major changes in Ontario's policy environment in the 1990s, including privatization and marketization, noting that shifts in higher education finance policy led to a shift in the balance of public and private sources. Examining the case of British Columbia, Dennison and Schuetze (2004) reviewed key changes in public policy that opened higher education to market forces, noting that these were framed in terms of enhancing accessibility and choice; in a similar vein, Schuetze and Bruneau (2004) situated Canadian high-er education reform in an international context, including increased reliance on market mechanisms, private sources of funding, and new forms of university governance and management. Boggs (2009) summarized a 10-year policy history on tuition fees in Ontario and discussed active policy challenges and options, noting the ongoing tensions between the policy goals of financing higher education and ensuring student accessibility.…”
Section: S: New Focus On Policy Histories Contexts and Impactsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jones (2004) charted and assessed major changes in Ontario's policy environment in the 1990s, including privatization and marketization, noting that shifts in higher education finance policy led to a shift in the balance of public and private sources. Examining the case of British Columbia, Dennison and Schuetze (2004) reviewed key changes in public policy that opened higher education to market forces, noting that these were framed in terms of enhancing accessibility and choice; in a similar vein, Schuetze and Bruneau (2004) situated Canadian high-er education reform in an international context, including increased reliance on market mechanisms, private sources of funding, and new forms of university governance and management. Boggs (2009) summarized a 10-year policy history on tuition fees in Ontario and discussed active policy challenges and options, noting the ongoing tensions between the policy goals of financing higher education and ensuring student accessibility.…”
Section: S: New Focus On Policy Histories Contexts and Impactsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on continuing education acknowledges the preoccupation of UCE units with cost recovery programming that focuses on preparing people for production and their role in the market economy (Gouthro, 2002;Lauzon, 2000;Schuetze & Bruneau, 2004). However, there is also interest in realigning the work of UCE units by working with organizations involved in social justice (Cruikshank, 2001).…”
Section: Revenue Generation and Social-purpose Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%