1991
DOI: 10.1007/bf00114162
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Letter recognition using Holland-style adaptive classifiers

Abstract: Abstract. Machine rule induction was examined on a difficult categorization problem by applying a Hollandstyle classifier system to a complex letter recognition task. A set of 20,000 unique letter images was generated by randomly distorting pixel images of the 26 uppercase letters from 20 different commercial fonts. The parent fonts represented a full range of character types including script, italic, serif, and Gothic. The features of each of the 20,000 characters were summarized in terms of 16 primitive nume… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
157
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 257 publications
(159 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
157
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The selected benchmark datasets include 3 small datasets: Glass, Iris [8] and Vehicle [37], as well as 5 prepartitioned larger datasets: Letter [11], Pendigits [2], Satimage, Segmentation and Thyroid [23]. The parameters of the used datasets are summarised in Table 1.…”
Section: Basic Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selected benchmark datasets include 3 small datasets: Glass, Iris [8] and Vehicle [37], as well as 5 prepartitioned larger datasets: Letter [11], Pendigits [2], Satimage, Segmentation and Thyroid [23]. The parameters of the used datasets are summarised in Table 1.…”
Section: Basic Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classification problems being addressed considered datasets from the Frey and Slate letter recognition problem [48]. The features which described the classification problems included the number of instances, number of classes, number of prototypes per class, number of relevant and irrelevant attributes, and the distribution range of the instances and prototypes.…”
Section: Algorithm Selection For Classification Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6c indicates that organization has occurred in the vast region where outliers are located. On the basis of these images, the following set of outlying neurons is detected: (8, O), (9, O), (10, O), (11, O), (8,1), (9,1), (10,1), (11,1), (9,2), (10,2), (11,2), (10,3) and (11,3). Note that neurons (8,2), (9,3) and (11,4), pointed out by the MID image, have been exduded as the projection shows that they lie next to the main doud.…”
Section: Moderate Dispersionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There we find the 100 outliers plus seven other patterns sticking out at the right tail of the distribution. These seven extra patterns are the least outlying (in the box-plot) and project on to neurons (0,5), (0,7), (O, 11), (2, 1), (4,5), (6,1) and (7,11), none of which was labelled as outlying. These patterns may thus be seen as mild outliers projecting on to inlying neurons.…”
Section: Moderate Dispersionmentioning
confidence: 99%