2013
DOI: 10.1115/1.4025658
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Level Set, Phase-Field, and Immersed Boundary Methods for Two-Phase Fluid Flows

Abstract: In this paper, we review and compare the level set, phase-field, and immersed boundary methods for incompressible two-phase flows. The models are based on modified Navier–Stokes and interface evolution equations. We present the basic concepts behind these approaches and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each method. We also present numerical solutions of the three methods and perform characteristic numerical experiments for two-phase fluid flows.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where 𝑀(∅), denoting mobility, has been given various definitions in the literature. In the phasefield method, the surface tension force is obtained by the following 40 :…”
Section: B Two-phase Flow Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where 𝑀(∅), denoting mobility, has been given various definitions in the literature. In the phasefield method, the surface tension force is obtained by the following 40 :…”
Section: B Two-phase Flow Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two main types of this model include the Allen-Cahn and Cahn-Hilliard equations. The governing equations for both types have been delineated and investigated in the literature 37,38 ; however, this article largely focuses on the Cahn-Hilliard equation, especially in conjunction with the Navier-Stokes equation [39][40][41] . On top of that, the Cahn-Hilliard equation has been successfully coupled with different viscoelastic fluid models in previous works [42][43][44] that investigate the applicability of the phase-field model to solve multi-phase non-Newtonian fluid flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, the level set method is based on reinitialization techniques which greatly affect accuracy and efficiency. Combined with the known mass loss problems of the method, this leads to the observed deviations [33]. The deviation could be removed by introducing an experimentally determined correction factor into the model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it is important to choose appropriate ϵ values for accurate calculations. An excessively large ϵ can produce nonphysical solutions, whereas an excessively small ϵ can cause numerical difficulties [39].…”
Section: Governing Equations and Interface Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%