1985
DOI: 10.1016/0018-506x(85)90041-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lever pressing for pups: Evidence for hormonal influence upon maternal behavior of mice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

4
69
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
69
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Pups' increasing size and functional capacity coincides with a dramatic reduction in maternal behavior (Bridges et al 1972;Reisbick et al 1975;Stern and Mackinnon 1978), while young pups increase the frequency and quality of maternal behavior (Noirot 1964a(Noirot , b, 1965Stern and Mackinnon 1978) and activate dopaminergic reward circuits in the brain (Ferris et al 2005). However, maternal behavior and motivation do not covary in the postpartum dam (Hauser and Gandelman 1985;Mattson et al 2003). As dams prefer either young or old (age-matched) pups equally in a dual-choice CPP procedure (Wansaw and Morrell, unpublished observations), maternal motivation may be driven not by pups but by undetermined physiological or behavioral changes in the dam that subsequently affect her responsivity to pups across multiple developmental time points.…”
Section: Conditioned Place Preferencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Pups' increasing size and functional capacity coincides with a dramatic reduction in maternal behavior (Bridges et al 1972;Reisbick et al 1975;Stern and Mackinnon 1978), while young pups increase the frequency and quality of maternal behavior (Noirot 1964a(Noirot , b, 1965Stern and Mackinnon 1978) and activate dopaminergic reward circuits in the brain (Ferris et al 2005). However, maternal behavior and motivation do not covary in the postpartum dam (Hauser and Gandelman 1985;Mattson et al 2003). As dams prefer either young or old (age-matched) pups equally in a dual-choice CPP procedure (Wansaw and Morrell, unpublished observations), maternal motivation may be driven not by pups but by undetermined physiological or behavioral changes in the dam that subsequently affect her responsivity to pups across multiple developmental time points.…”
Section: Conditioned Place Preferencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pups, the second unconditioned stimulus used in the present study, can be uniquely and highly rewarding to the postpartum dam (Wilsoncroft 1969;Hauser and Gandelman 1985;Fleming et al 1994;Magnusson and Fleming 1995;Lee et al 2000;Wansaw et al 2003b;Ferris et al 2005). Early postpartum dams prefer chambers paired with pups over pup-sized neutral rubber objects after just 15 min of deprivation from their pups (Wansaw et al 2003b) and voluntarily stay in the nest for the longest periods of time Ader 1969, 1974;Ader and Grota 1970;Stern and Keer 2002); in contrast, late postpartum dams strongly prefer chambers paired with alternative nonpup stimuli, even after 12 h of pup deprivation, and leave their pups for increasingly longer intervals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In the mouse, the onset of maternal behavior is not strictly dependent on the high levels of estrogen produced during late pregnancy; nulliparous females demonstrate spontaneous maternal behavior (10)(11)(12)(13)(14), as do ovariectomized and aromatase knockout mice (14,15). However, there is evidence indicating a role for estrogen (14)(15)(16) and demonstrating the importance of ERa in the display of mouse maternal behavior (17,18).…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Conditioning techniques have been used to help distinguish between motivation and performance for many behaviors including feeding and drinking (Hodos 1961;Skinner 1938), drug taking (Weeks 1964), running (Kagan and Berkun 1954), copulation , maternal behavior (Hauser and Gandelman 1985;Lee et al 1999), as well as aggression (Connor 1974;Fish et al 2002). Such distinctions can be illuminating as in the stimulation of food-reinforced lever pressing by the anorectic drug amphetamine (Gonzalez and Goldberg 1977;Hoebel 1985;Foltin 2001), and the increased responding for access to an infusion of a moderate cocaine dose but overall suppression of cocaine intake by 5-HT 1B agonists (Parsons et al 1998).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%