2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-08338-4_39
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leveraging Open Data for Supporting a Cloud Robotics Service in a Smart City Environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By delegating high complexity computational loads to the cloud platform, the robots no longer require high performing onboard equipment, thus greatly reducing the cost of the application of multi-robot systems. As Ermacora et al [68] proposed smart city with cloud robotic service, with the development of cloud computing, big data and other fields, the robotic clouds in SLAM, grasping, navigation and other applications will achieve better performance.…”
Section: Concussionsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…By delegating high complexity computational loads to the cloud platform, the robots no longer require high performing onboard equipment, thus greatly reducing the cost of the application of multi-robot systems. As Ermacora et al [68] proposed smart city with cloud robotic service, with the development of cloud computing, big data and other fields, the robotic clouds in SLAM, grasping, navigation and other applications will achieve better performance.…”
Section: Concussionsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The main idea within this framework is to convert the robot into a cloud agent, while most of the computation is done on remote servers. Moreover, the cloud robotics platform is also able to guarantee the robustness needed for long-term operativeness in the robotics applications and to expose simple APIs to the final user [17], [18], [19]. A schematic description of the framework used can be see in Figure. The mobile robot communicates with the CRP through a fast wireless internet connection, e.g., resorting on a Long Term Evolution (LTE) cellular data network.…”
Section: The Developed Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is likely due to the presence of the citizens, which might naturally be more inclined to share the urban space with human-friendly presences. Aerial platforms-employed both as single units [16,26,28,76] and in combination with other platforms [60], are less common, likely due to the rather recent emergence of drones as reliable platforms, as well as to the regulations currently restricting their usage in public spaces. The ability of robots to perform different actions is analyzed in Fig.…”
Section: Agent Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Publicly available passage and exhibit spaces are overall more common, specifically in outdoor scenarios. Figure 13 reports that few works have some form of robotgovernment interaction, typically in cases in which robots are employed by the public administration as a support for security or maintenance [16,[26][27][28]79,81,107]. Figure 14 shows that robots mainly acquire and process data from the city, while dissemination (being more timeconsuming) is less common [16,17,79,81,107], and mostly employed when teams of robots are involved.…”
Section: Interaction Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%