2005
DOI: 10.1007/11573548_61
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lexical Resources and Semantic Similarity for Affective Evaluative Expressions Generation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other dimensional models have been used, but generally with dimensions not driven by psychological theories but the output of corpora based approaches such as Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA). Example of this work are Bellegarda (2010) and Valitutti, Strapparava, and Stock (2005).…”
Section: Emotions In Textmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other dimensional models have been used, but generally with dimensions not driven by psychological theories but the output of corpora based approaches such as Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA). Example of this work are Bellegarda (2010) and Valitutti, Strapparava, and Stock (2005).…”
Section: Emotions In Textmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Starting from WordNet Affect, Valitutti et al [4] proposed a simple word presence method in order to detect emotions. Ma et al [12] designed an emotion extractor from chat logs, based on the same simple word presence.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the field of Sentiment Analysis and Emotion Detection based on text data, two main directions for research exist: one concentrating on building better annotations of linguistic resources, such as dictionaries or ontologies [2], [3], and the other on building better classifiers for valence, sentiment or emotion detection [4], [5], [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Textual Semantics posits that the relevant semantic content of the lexicon actually corresponds to highly contextual categories rather than generic ones (this differs from the introduction of generic emotional tags [33] and corresponds to specific types of applications). This leads to a redefinition of lexical content in context, based on the identification of the most relevant semantic domains.…”
Section: Affinity(e R Low) Anger(e R High) Affinity(e C High)]mentioning
confidence: 99%