2016
DOI: 10.5673/sip.55.2.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lički Osik – Urbanističko-arhitektonsko naslijeđe moderne kao razvojni potencijal turizma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This data is of interest because these areas tend to be of less interest for the development of research due to the absence of regulation or planning. On the other hand, 13 documents refer to urban areas, highlighting the works of Kodir [53], which show an analysis of economic development from tourism experienced by the city of Batu, Indonesia; as well as the work of Kranjčević et al [54], whose aim is to determine the potential for the development of cultural heritage, and in particular, the urban and architectural heritage of Lički (Croatia). Finally, 21 documents with considerably large areas of study are identified, covering both urban and rural areas.…”
Section: Intentionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This data is of interest because these areas tend to be of less interest for the development of research due to the absence of regulation or planning. On the other hand, 13 documents refer to urban areas, highlighting the works of Kodir [53], which show an analysis of economic development from tourism experienced by the city of Batu, Indonesia; as well as the work of Kranjčević et al [54], whose aim is to determine the potential for the development of cultural heritage, and in particular, the urban and architectural heritage of Lički (Croatia). Finally, 21 documents with considerably large areas of study are identified, covering both urban and rural areas.…”
Section: Intentionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies on the aspects of development, architectural renovation, and urban planning are relevant for a number of new cities of the former USSR, countries formed after its collapse, and countries of the former socialist camp [17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Table 1 Dominant City-forming Factors Of Some "New Cities" Fmentioning
confidence: 99%