Lietuvos Nepilnamečių Justicijos Reformos Ir Nepilnamečių Nusikalstamumo Dinamika Klaipėdoje 1995–2019 M.

Acus, Arūnas; Kraniauskas, Liutauras

doi:10.15181/tbb.v83i2.2070

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Research into spatial cohesion and spatial justice has been underdeveloped and often limited to generalized speculations about urban space transformations and urban discourse, unsubstantiated by any empirical data (Samalavičius, 2005;Burneika, Kriaučiūnas, & Ubarevičienė, 2010;Lavrinec, 2011) or general reflections on urban culture (Samalavičius, 2010). Lately, the most thoroughly analyzed aspects have been discursively constructed identities of particular cities (Maniukaitė et al, 2014), urban subcultures (Kraniauskas, 2012a(Kraniauskas, , 2012b, safety and sustainability in Lithuanian cities (Ceccato & Lukyte, 2010;Acus, 2011), and housing policies (Aidukaitė, 2013;Aidukaitė et al, 2014). Hardly any attempt has been made to scrutinize empirically based processes of spatial justice, socio-spatial segregation and differentiation in the post-Soviet Lithuanian cities and countryside.…”

Section: Spatial Perspective and Regional Socio-economic Development:...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Social Investment Policies and Territorial Inequalities

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Drawing on recent research perspectives, the book discusses how social investment policies could be responsive to territorial inequalities in terms of better policy coordination, capacities, and institutional infrastructures' adaptability to territorial needs. By combining theoretical notions about territorial cohesion, territorial development, and social investment, the book provides an argument for the "territorialization of social investment policy" in the case of Lithuania. Featuring a range of contributors, the book inspires us to look differently at the territorial sensitivity of welfare policy strategies implemented in advantaged developing areas and those which are disadvantaged peripheral territories.

show abstract

Section: Spatial Perspective and Regional Socio-economic Development:...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Social Investment Policies and Territorial Inequalities

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

International Comparison of Manifestations and Tendencies of Latent Juvenile Delinquency in Lithuania

Sakalauskas

2022

STEPP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Juvenile delinquency is a universal phenomenon inherent in the process of biological and social maturation characterized by high latency. Although juvenile delinquent behaviour, due to its spontaneity and recklessness, is easily noticeable and not difficult to investigate, it is often not officially recorded because it is primarily addressed through means of informal social control. Various studies show that children from disadvantaged backgrounds are much more likely to fall into a network of formal social control. Thus, the registered juvenile delinquency not only makes up a very small part of the total juvenile delinquency but its structure and socio-demographic indicators of the accused are also distorted by the selectivity and stigmatization of social control. However, when analysing juvenile delinquency in Lithuania, it is still common to present only the number of registered cases, to analyse them, draw certain conclusions based on them alone, and even develop preventative juvenile delinquency programs. This situation is partly due to the Soviet tradition, which still significantly impacts the general approach to criminal behaviour, in which the latency of criminal behaviour was considered not as a natural and inevitable but a negative and to be destroyed phenomenon. On the other hand, there are few studies of latent juvenile delinquency in Lithuania. They are carried out irregularly according to different methodologies and do not always cover the full complexity of juvenile delinquency. In the article manifestations of latent juvenile delinquency, its’ structure and tendencies in Lithuania are analyzed, Lithuanian indicators are also compared with the indicators of other European countries. Despite some differences in the structure of juvenile delinquency between countries, it can be argued that delinquent behavior is common among juveniles living in all countries, and is usually mild and episodic. According to the analyzed indicators, Lithuania stands out with one essential difference – frequent bullying among secondary school students in all age groups.

show abstract

Lietuvos Nepilnamečių Justicijos Reformos Ir Nepilnamečių Nusikalstamumo Dinamika Klaipėdoje 1995–2019 M.

Cited by 2 publications

References 3 publications

Social Investment Policies and Territorial Inequalities

Social Investment Policies and Territorial Inequalities

International Comparison of Manifestations and Tendencies of Latent Juvenile Delinquency in Lithuania

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About