2020
DOI: 10.3390/su12083460
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Life-Cycle Assessment and Monetary Measurements for the Carbon Footprint Reduction of Public Buildings

Abstract: Energy consumption in public buildings increased drastically over the last decade. Significant policy actions towards the promotion of energy efficiency in the building sector have been developed involving sustainable low-CO2-emission technologies. This paper presents the results of an economic–environmental valuation of a standard energy retrofit project for a public building in a Mediterranean area, integrating a life-cycle assessment (LCA) into the traditional economic–financial evaluation pattern. The stud… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [29], a new and structured approach was developed to carry out an uncertainty and sensitivity analysis in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) in order to support the decision-making process in building renovation. Likewise, in [30], a life cycle assessment was used in order to make an economic-environmental valuation of a standard energy retrofit project for a public building in a Mediterranean area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [29], a new and structured approach was developed to carry out an uncertainty and sensitivity analysis in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) in order to support the decision-making process in building renovation. Likewise, in [30], a life cycle assessment was used in order to make an economic-environmental valuation of a standard energy retrofit project for a public building in a Mediterranean area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discounted payback period (DPbP) is the number of years it takes to break even from undertaking the investment cost (I 0 ) by discounting future cash flows and recognizing the time value of money (r > 0) [124][125][126][127][128][129][130][131][132][133][134][135][136]; the higher the discount rate, the longer the DPbP. More simply, a payback period (PP) can be calculated without considering the time preference rate (r = 0) [137][138][139].…”
Section: Efficiency Criteria For Policies To Protect the Natural Heritage And The Performance Of The Management Planmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above description shows that the UE H index characterizes only the quality of the external envelopes of the buildings, which is influenced, among other things, by the insulation of building partitions, the degree of glazing, the shape of the body, and orientation towards the directions of the world [18,19]. On the other hand, the FE H index represents the quality of the building along with its technical system, so the value of the index depends on the efficiency of heat-generating devices in the building, the amount of heat distribution losses and the efficiency of heat regulation and use, i.e., the quality of technical parameters and solutions in general.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A literature review finds a dearth of empirical studies that illustrate the correlation between the performed retrofitting and the predicted and measured gas consumption, in particular in the case of performance gap observed in buildings with poor energy standard and reduced conditions of thermal comfort. Although similar studies were previously published, they usually referred to other locations and involved simulation data on the energy performance before and after refurbishment [16,19], included shorter observation periods and limited number of buildings [35,36] or discussed other types of objects [37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%