2016
DOI: 10.1587/transinf.2016edl8163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LigeroAV: A Light-Weight, Signature-Based Antivirus for Mobile Environment

Abstract: SUMMARYCurrent signature-based antivirus solutions have three limitations such as the large volume of signature database, privacy preservation, and computation overheads of signature matching. In this paper, we propose LigeroAV, a light-weight, performance-enhanced antivirus, suitable for pervasive environments such as mobile phones. LigeroAV focuses on detecting MD5 signatures which are more than 90% of signatures. LigeroAV offloads matching computation in the cloud server with up-todated signature database w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conventional antivirus solutions detect a malware by extracting the signature from a binary file, and comparing it with the malware database [1]. However, over 100 millions of new malwares are published every year [2], [3] so that the overall size of signature database also needs to increase significantly and rapidly, which can be a potential performance bottleneck in malware detection mechanisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional antivirus solutions detect a malware by extracting the signature from a binary file, and comparing it with the malware database [1]. However, over 100 millions of new malwares are published every year [2], [3] so that the overall size of signature database also needs to increase significantly and rapidly, which can be a potential performance bottleneck in malware detection mechanisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various studies have sought strategies to prevent performance degradation. Typically, the pre-matching method [2], [3] cloud method [4], or a combination of the two [5], [6] are employed. However, these studies assumed that virus scans would have to be carried out in advance because the comparison overhead was significant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%