2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.softx.2016.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Light-Field Imaging Toolkit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The raw image of I ( s , t ) is initially calibrated to assign the center position of individual microimages and then converted to the 4D radiance arrays of L ( u , v , s , t ) with the light‐field imaging toolkit (LFIT v2.4). [ 33 ] The disparity map is estimated using a cost volume‐based stereomatching algorithm, [ 16 ] which measures the similarity between the center view and the sub‐aperture images and matches the cost of different disparity labels to estimate the stereo‐correspondences with sub‐label precision. In addition, the camera matrices, that is, intrinsic ([ K ]) and extrinsic matrices ([ R | t ]), are calculated from a raw checker board image with a known pattern size using the geometric calibration algorithm [ 34 ] (more light‐field reconstruction and depth map results in Figure S4, Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The raw image of I ( s , t ) is initially calibrated to assign the center position of individual microimages and then converted to the 4D radiance arrays of L ( u , v , s , t ) with the light‐field imaging toolkit (LFIT v2.4). [ 33 ] The disparity map is estimated using a cost volume‐based stereomatching algorithm, [ 16 ] which measures the similarity between the center view and the sub‐aperture images and matches the cost of different disparity labels to estimate the stereo‐correspondences with sub‐label precision. In addition, the camera matrices, that is, intrinsic ([ K ]) and extrinsic matrices ([ R | t ]), are calculated from a raw checker board image with a known pattern size using the geometric calibration algorithm [ 34 ] (more light‐field reconstruction and depth map results in Figure S4, Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DHMx runs under Linux and is open-source (https://github.com/ dhm-org/dhm_suite). FLFM reconstruction was performed using another group's open-source package [14]. Full amplitude and phase reconstructions were made using custom Fiji plug-ins that we have published previously [15].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The raw microimages were separated into R, G, and B channels, and then reconstructed into a 4D radiance array of L ( u , v , s , t ) for each channel microimage using the Light‐field imaging toolkit. [ 31 ] The 4D arrays with different color channels were combined to form 5D radiance arrays of L ( u , v , s , t , c ). Light‐field images from the 5D arrays contain optical aberrations caused by the objective lens and the MLA as shown in Figure S10, Supporting Information.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The captured raw microimages were calibrated for high contrast light‐field imaging by using the Light‐field Imaging Toolkit [ 31 ] and finally reconstructed for a disparity map by using an open disparity calculation toolbox based on cost volume filtering [ 32 ] The light‐field data consist of 5D matrices (43 × 43 × 116 × 85 × 3), including spatial and directional 4D data and RGB color indices. The photograph of fully integrated ULFC is as shown in Figure a.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%