2006
DOI: 10.1002/rsa.20136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limit laws for embedded trees: Applications to the integrated superBrownian excursion

Abstract: ABSTRACT:We study three families of labeled plane trees. In all these trees, the root is labeled 0 and the labels of two adjacent nodes differ by 0, 1, or −1.One part of the paper is devoted to enumerative results. For each family, and for all j ∈ N, we obtain closed form expressions for the following three generating functions: the generating function of trees having no label larger than j; the (bivariate) generating function of trees, counted by the number of edges and the number of nodes labeled j; and fina… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
64
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We will not figure out this but refer to [3,18] for applications of that technique to similar types of generating functions. This leads to the following formula for the density f 1 (x) of the limiting distribution of the out-degree of the root:…”
Section: The Density Appearing In Case C (Generalized Plane-oriented mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We will not figure out this but refer to [3,18] for applications of that technique to similar types of generating functions. This leads to the following formula for the density f 1 (x) of the limiting distribution of the out-degree of the root:…”
Section: The Density Appearing In Case C (Generalized Plane-oriented mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In related work, the difference between left and right depths of individual nodes has been studied from a different point of view by Bousquet-Mélou [5]. She considers the generating function of the number of nodes with a given difference and obtains limit results on the distribution of this number.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here the right (left) depth of a certain node in a binary tree is the number of right (left) edges on the path from the root to the node considered, whereas the right (left) pathlength of a binary tree is the sum of the right (left) depths over all nodes in the tree. In [1], amongst many others, the random variable X n ( j) was studied, which counts the number of nodes in a random binary tree of size n with difference j between the right and the left depth. As one of the main results of [1] the limiting distribution of X n λn 1 4 , λ ≥ 0, was characterized and thus the so-called "vertical profile" of binary trees was well described.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [1], amongst many others, the random variable X n ( j) was studied, which counts the number of nodes in a random binary tree of size n with difference j between the right and the left depth. As one of the main results of [1] the limiting distribution of X n λn 1 4 , λ ≥ 0, was characterized and thus the so-called "vertical profile" of binary trees was well described. In [6] all moments E (D r n ) of the difference D n between the right and the left pathlength of random binary trees of size n are computed asymptotically and as a consequence the limiting distribution of the suitably scaled random variable n − 5 4 D n was characterized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%