2016 International Conference on Control, Decision and Information Technologies (CoDIT) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/codit.2016.7593655
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limitations on dominant pole pair selection with continuous PI and PID controllers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Pole zero cancellation technique is an effective way to compensate undesirable effects posed by the plant poles as arbitrary pole placement (APP) is not recommended to design output feedback controller. The APP method demands higher order controller or use of full state feedback controller after checking the rank of the controllability matrix to be same as system order [21].Finally, the passive components of the compensator have been determined considering availability and ease of use, the resistors𝑅 𝐶1 ́, 𝑅 𝑓3 ́,𝑅 𝑓1 ́, 𝑅 𝑓2 ́, have been selected to be 20kΩ, 1.33kΩ, 25kΩ and 1.1kΩ respectively and the capacitors 𝐶 𝐶1 ́,𝐶 𝐶2 ́,𝐶 𝐶𝑓3 ́have been selected to be 7.1nF, 0.155nF and 2.66nF respectively in the hardware prototype. The frequency response plot of the proposed converter before and after the realisationof controller has been recorded in Fig.…”
Section: Small Signal Modelling and Design Of Controllermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Pole zero cancellation technique is an effective way to compensate undesirable effects posed by the plant poles as arbitrary pole placement (APP) is not recommended to design output feedback controller. The APP method demands higher order controller or use of full state feedback controller after checking the rank of the controllability matrix to be same as system order [21].Finally, the passive components of the compensator have been determined considering availability and ease of use, the resistors𝑅 𝐶1 ́, 𝑅 𝑓3 ́,𝑅 𝑓1 ́, 𝑅 𝑓2 ́, have been selected to be 20kΩ, 1.33kΩ, 25kΩ and 1.1kΩ respectively and the capacitors 𝐶 𝐶1 ́,𝐶 𝐶2 ́,𝐶 𝐶𝑓3 ́have been selected to be 7.1nF, 0.155nF and 2.66nF respectively in the hardware prototype. The frequency response plot of the proposed converter before and after the realisationof controller has been recorded in Fig.…”
Section: Small Signal Modelling and Design Of Controllermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This controller enjoys the advantages of more freedom in placing the poles and zeros and achieve better stability margin compared to conventional PI controller. Design of k-factor based type III controllers with optimum performance and faster transient response have been presented in [16][17][18].Method of Pole placement for controller design using all accessible state variables are used in [19].PI controller along with sigma delta modulator has been implemented for the converter presented in [20] [24].Restrictions of dominant pole placement (DPP) method of controller is analysed in [21].The control scheme adopted in [23] shapes the auxiliary inductor current for the improvement of dynamic response. Soft-switching quasi-resonant converters (QRC) use active and/or passive resonant networks, in addition to basic components of normal pulse-width-modulation (PWM) converters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dominant pole placement by standard PID controller (parallel form) has been well studied. Effective methods with low overshoot can be found in Hagglund and Astrom (1985), Persson and Astrom (1992), Tang et al (2006), Atherton (2009), Wang et al (2009), Liu et al (2015), and Dincel and Soylemez (2016). Due to its simplicity and ease of use, the method raised by Wang et al (2009) is adopted in this paper.…”
Section: Design Of Dominant Pole Control Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Baskın kutup atama yönteminde, kapalı çevrim sistemin aşım ve yerleşme zamanı gibi performans özellikleri daha çok baskın bölgedeki kutuplar tarafından belirlendiğinden, kapalı çevrim sistemin kutuplarından ikisinin baskın bölgede, kalan kutupların ise mümkün olduğunca baskın kutuplardan uzakta (genellikle 3-5 kat) konumlanması istenir [8]. Bu yöntem etkili bir tasarım yöntemi olsa da, kalan kutuplar baskın kutuplardan yeterince uzağa yerleştirilmezse, kapalı çevrim sistemin geçici hal yanıtını tahmin etmek zorlaşır ve bu durumda istenilen performans özelliklerinin karşılanması garanti edilemez [9].…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Böylece, yerleşme zamanı ve aşım gibi istenilen performans özellikleri karşılanabilmektedir. Bir başka çalışmada, Dincel E ve Söylemez MT tarafından kapalı çevrim sistemin istenilen performans özelliklerini karşılamak için kapalı çevrim sistemin kutuplarından ikisini istenen bir bölgeye atayan ve kalan kutupların ise baskın kutuplardan uzakta konumlanmalarını sağlayan PI ve PID kontrolörleri tasarlanmıştır [31]. Bahsedilen bu çalışmalar sürekli zaman alanında yapılmıştır, fakat ayrık zaman alanında baskın kutup bölgesi atama üzerine bu şekilde bir çalışma bulunmamaktadır.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified