2003
DOI: 10.1002/9780471722199
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linear Regression Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
1,410
0
67

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,831 publications
(1,481 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
1,410
0
67
Order By: Relevance
“…The model includes an estimate of temporal autocorrelation. The effective degrees of freedom were estimated as described in Worsley and Friston (1995) and in Seber (1977). In the following, contrast maps, i.e., estimates of the raw scores, were generated for each subject.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model includes an estimate of temporal autocorrelation. The effective degrees of freedom were estimated as described in Worsley and Friston (1995) and in Seber (1977). In the following, contrast maps, i.e., estimates of the raw scores, were generated for each subject.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, U G will generally consist of 50% drug-dose combinations from each X G and V G . In the last step, which is the selection step, the new combinations (U G where β 0 , β i , β ii and β ij represent the coefficients of the intercept, linear, quadratic and bilinear (or interaction) terms, respectively, y represents the response variable (the output), x i and x j are independent variables (the inputs, which represent the drugs) and ε is an error term with a mean close to zero 26 .…”
Section: Experimental Design Input Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The logarithmic transformation of the function CV(x)= A/X B that resulted in the model for both replications of k, varying from 1 to 5 clones, was used to test parallelism, same origin and coincidence among the five clones (Seber, 1976). The approximate statistic of the hypothesis test for H 01 and H 02 , and for H 03 , where was the combined sum square error; was the sum of the sum square error of each clone; K was the number of compared clones (K= 5); and n was the number of total observations (plot sizes and replications).…”
Section: Palavras-chavementioning
confidence: 99%