2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.rinp.2018.03.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Linear triangular optimization technique and pricing scheme in residential energy management systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…RTEP being superior in flexibility as compared to both TOUP and CPP, but has the drawback of concentrating many appliances at low EP areas. Considering this constraint, the proposed system combines IBR with RTEP which can vary EP rates in the low EP time slot based on the power consumption of the appliances [38]. This prevents another peak that can occur in low EP time slots.…”
Section: B Selected Pricing Scheme and Modified Inclined Block Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…RTEP being superior in flexibility as compared to both TOUP and CPP, but has the drawback of concentrating many appliances at low EP areas. Considering this constraint, the proposed system combines IBR with RTEP which can vary EP rates in the low EP time slot based on the power consumption of the appliances [38]. This prevents another peak that can occur in low EP time slots.…”
Section: B Selected Pricing Scheme and Modified Inclined Block Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 8 shows the pricing data which are taken from the research articles written by authors Amir Anees et al 30 and Nazer et al 31 For the proposed pricing scheme we have taken p = 5 cents/kWh as flat price which is calculated as p = (100 × 0.20)/4 = 5; where 100 cents are considered per day income for a lower class (here, it is taken 100 cents only for research purpose the actual data can be different such as in India it is less than 50 cents/day) and 20 percent is considered for spent of energy requirement (it can be different such as 15 percent, or 25 percent, or 10 percent) and approximate energy consumption per day by a low class consumer is 4 kWh. q is taken as 10 cents/kWh, L th is 1 kW, LM th is 1.5 kW, α 1 is 1.2, and α 2 is 1.5.…”
Section: Comparison and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(a) A large number of HEMS algorithms in recent research are based on SOO [3,[8][9][10]12,15], whereas the real life problems for HEMS are mostly based on MOO with conflicting objectives. In order to handle MO, such problems are desired to be solved for a diverse set of TOs between the objectives.…”
Section: Limitations Of the Recent Research And Proposed Resolutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(c) Most of the algorithms for HEMS have not been evaluated for a diversified performance for an adequate number of TPs. The algorithms have mostly been tested for a single TP based on a DPS [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][13][14][15][16][17]20,21]. The optimal performance of an algorithm, however, does vary if evaluated for a diversified set of TPs [22].…”
Section: Limitations Of the Recent Research And Proposed Resolutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation