The relevance of this study lies in the fact that the study of the typological diversity of the discourse space in semiotic, cognitive, communicative, cultural and other directions continues to open up new facets and approaches for analysis, which is confirmed by a review of the degree of development of the topic in modern philology, which indicates the fact that the problem of interpretation of discourses continues to attract the attention of scientists from various scientific fields, which puts the topic under study in an interdisciplinary framework. On a theoretical basis, the authors turn to the basic concepts of their research, namely, they clarify the definitions of political, theatrical discourses and media discourse and highlight their systemic features to determine the point of interpenetration of these discourses. A correctly orchestrated political event, a clear alignment of the event series, plays an important role in political life, since modern society is inclined to perceive even political reality through the prism of large-scale entertainment and performance. To achieve its goal, dictated by the context of a particular political event and the course of its development, political media discourse successfully uses the main elements of theatrical discourse. Duality of dramatic stage speech: when an actor in his monologue addresses the viewer, when the course of the play requires the direct participation of the viewer and further remarks of the actors completely depend on the context of the viewer's statements, street performances, live dialogical contact of the characters.