2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00607-014-0414-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LINKORD: link ordering-based data gathering protocol for wireless sensor networks

Abstract: With respect to the multi-hop communication pattern of wireless sensor networks, all the nodes should establish multi-hop paths towards a common data gathering point to provide a data gathering service for the underlying applications. Although data gathering protocols provide a simple service, these protocols suffer from poor performance in practice due to the power constraints of low-power sensor nodes and unreliability of wireless links. Existing data gathering protocols rely on the ETX metric to find high-t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The link ordering-based data gathering protocol (LINKORD) [ 45 ], which works similarly to the CTP, proposed a new path cost function to prevent path construction that required more than the maximum number of transmissions allowed by the link layer. The proposed path cost function could construct a routing path with high throughput considering the data transmission probability and relative location of the link.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The link ordering-based data gathering protocol (LINKORD) [ 45 ], which works similarly to the CTP, proposed a new path cost function to prevent path construction that required more than the maximum number of transmissions allowed by the link layer. The proposed path cost function could construct a routing path with high throughput considering the data transmission probability and relative location of the link.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…55, which is bigger than the one that a packet passes the last link in path b, i.e., 1. It is known from [22] that path b is the best choice. The reason is that due to the presence of "bad" link near the destination in path a, data packets are more likely to be dropped on that link, resulting in the waste of transmission effort on pervious links (i.e., the link between S and A) as well as increased the transmission cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%