2011 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record 2011
DOI: 10.1109/nssmic.2011.6153798
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

List-mode maximum-likelihood reconstruction for the ClearPEM system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The images acquired as described in IIA were reconstructed with a list mode Maximum-Likelihood ExpectationMaximization (MLEM) implementation [2], using different voxel sizes and 7 iterations (Fig. 3 shows an example with voxels of 1x1x1 mm 3 ).…”
Section: Image Reconstruction and Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The images acquired as described in IIA were reconstructed with a list mode Maximum-Likelihood ExpectationMaximization (MLEM) implementation [2], using different voxel sizes and 7 iterations (Fig. 3 shows an example with voxels of 1x1x1 mm 3 ).…”
Section: Image Reconstruction and Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ε k is the total efficiency of the kth voxel which is pre-calculated by results of a normalization acquisition in order to largely accelerate the reconstruction process [4]. Since the estimated value of ε k based on experimental acquisition differs to the true sensitivity map calculated by summing up all the LORs by a constant scaling factor, a normalization factor F (n) should be calculated for each iteration step to keep K k=1 x (n+1) k = N via:…”
Section: A Acquisition Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such DOI resolution, in addition to the high number of crystals, results in a total of over 3 billion possible lines of responses (LORs). This requires the use of list-mode reconstruction to maintain efficiency and accuracy [3], [4]. Effective correction approach for random coincidences is therewith a challenge for this system, because i) the classic random correction method with direct subtraction of delayed coincidences can induce a high level of noise; and ii) noise reduction for projection data is not directly applicable for listmode data without histogramming into sinograms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming that the total counts on the jth bin, Y j , can be separated into true counts, Yj , and random counts, P j (ignore scatter counts), the reconstruction problem can be formulated as: K Yj = Y j -P j = I C j. kXk· (6) k=1…”
Section: Random Correction With Smooth Correction Imagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the specific geometry of a PEM system, method i) induces a high statistical noise especially for the region close to torso due to the low statistics of the detected events. Furthermore, because of the low number of detected coincidence events against the extremely high number of LORs list-mode reconstruction algorithms are suggested for PEM systems [5], [6]. Method ii), however, cannot be applied to list-mode data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%