“…The writing of the policy papers involved distilling the outcomes from these meetings, developing initial papers and frameworks and undertaking further consultation with the relevant groups. Literature reviews were crucial to this process in terms developing understanding of a structure for technology as a discipline (e.g., Kline, 1987;Layton, 1994;Pacey, 1983;Pinch, Hughes & Bijker, 1987;Staudenmaier, 1985;Wajcman, 1991); student learning and learning in technology in particular (Brown, Collins & Duguid, 1989;Kimbell, Stables, Wheeler, Wosniak & Kelly, 1991;Perkins & Salomon, 1989;Resnick, Levine & Teasley, 1991); technology curricula internationally and critiques of it (e.g., Fleming, 1989;McCulloch, Jenkins & Layton, 1985;Medway, 1989Medway, , 1992Smithers & Robinson, 1992); and theoretical aspects of technology curriculum design (e.g., Johnson, 1992;Petrina, 1992;Zuga, 1992). The development of the policy papers attempted to reflect a broad notion of curriculum.…”