1993
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-1964-1_38
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lithium in Stars X-Ray Selected by EXOSAT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
16
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
5
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This agrees with the temperature maps, which show that the spot is larger and cooler in 2010 -although we recall that the phase coverage during 2010 is incomplete. The derived values agree well with the result byTagliaferri et al (1994), implying that AF Lep is a young object. Furthermore, the literature gives varying values for the equivalent width (EW) of the lithium line on AF Lep.…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This agrees with the temperature maps, which show that the spot is larger and cooler in 2010 -although we recall that the phase coverage during 2010 is incomplete. The derived values agree well with the result byTagliaferri et al (1994), implying that AF Lep is a young object. Furthermore, the literature gives varying values for the equivalent width (EW) of the lithium line on AF Lep.…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…The simulations show that the places of the spots (or spot groups) are correct, but the temperature contrast suffers from the lack of resolution. Tagliaferri et al (1994) have reported a lithium abundance of log N(Li) = 3.2 for AF Lep. Our 2005 observations do not cover the lithium line, but for the later observations this region is covered.…”
Section: Surface Spot Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the Columba association, to which κ And purportedly belongs, the only stars from published membership lists (Torres et al 2008;Malo et al 2013 Valenti & Fischer 2005), HD 31647 (-0.12; Hill 1995), HD 39206 (0.06; Lemke 1989), and HD 40216 (0.00; Tagliaferri et al 1994). Hence, thus Columba members have spectroscopic metallicities consistent with being approximately solar (mean [Fe/H] = 0.01 ± 0.05), and the spectroscopic [Fe/H] estimates for κ And would appear to make the star chemically peculiar if it is truly associated with Columba.…”
Section: Stellar Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… (1) the membership lists given by Eggen in his four decades of research on SKGs (Eggen 1958a,b, 1960a,b, 1975, 1983a–c, 1984a–c, 1989, 1991, 1992a–c, 1994, 1995a,b, 1996, 1998a–c), and additional lists given by Soderblom & Mayor (1993a); (2) the study by Agekyan & Orlov (1984) and Orlov et al (1995), which searched for kinematic groups in the solar neighbourhood (see also Popović, Ninković & Pavlović 1995); (3) the study of ages of spotted late‐type stars by Chugainov (1991); (4) X‐ray‐ and EUV‐selected active stars and lithium‐rich stars (Favata et al 1993, 1995, 1998; Jeffries & Jewell 1993; Mullis & Bopp 1994; Tagliaferri et al 1994; Jeffries 1995; Schachter et al 1996; Hünsch, Schmitt & Voges 1998a,b; Hünsch et al 1999; Cutispoto et al 1999; 2000); (5) single rapidly rotating stars such as AB Dor, PZ Tel, HD 197890, RE J1816+541, BD+224409 (LO Peg), HK Aqr, V838 Cen, V343 Nor and LQ Hya, previously assigned membership of the Local Association; (6) chromospherically active late‐type dwarfs in the solar neighbourhood with studied kinematic properties (Soderblom & Clements 1987; Young, Sadjadi & Harlan 1987; Upgren 1988; Soderblom 1990; Ambruster et al 1998); (7) flare stars with studied kinematic properties (Poveda et al 1996); (8) the study of field M dwarfs with high‐resolution spectra by Delfosse et al (1998), including the recently identified M9V star DENIS , which is the closest star later than M7V (Delfosse et al 2001); (9) other chromospherically active stars (Henry, Fekel & Hall 1995; Henry et al 1996; Soderblom et al 1998); (10) late‐type stars included in the list of the nearest 100 stellar systems given by the Research Consortium on Nearby Stars (RECONS 1 ); (11) the study of nearby young solar analogues by Gaidos (1998) and Gaidos, Henry & Henry (2000); (12) the sample of nearby, single, solar‐type stars selected as proxies for the Sun at different stages in the project the ‘Sun in Time’ by Bochanski et al (2000); (13) the study of nearby young X ‐ray‐active low‐mass stars with well‐measured parallaxes by Wichmann & Schmitt (2001), and (14) the active stars included in the Vienna‐KPNO search for Doppler‐imaging candidate stars (Strassmeier et al 2000). …”
Section: Selection Of the Samplementioning
confidence: 99%