Lithium iron phosphate coated carbon fiber electrodes for structural lithium ion batteries

Hagberg, Johan; Maples, Henry A.; Alvim, Kayne S.P.; Xu, Johanna; Johannisson, Wilhelm; Bismarck, Alexander; Zenkert, Dan; Lindbergh, Göran

doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.04.041

Cited by 105 publications

(69 citation statements)

References 35 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…To date only a limited number of studies on structural cathodes have been published, generally packing the cathode powder into the matrix either around each fiber ( Hagberg et al, 2018 ) or within a separate structural cathode ply ( Figures 2C,D ) ( Galos et al, 2020 ). The fiber architecture minimizes ionic resistances but increases the risk of shorts; the laminate architecture simplifies fabrication and current collection.…”

Section: Current Statusmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The fiber architecture minimizes ionic resistances but increases the risk of shorts; the laminate architecture simplifies fabrication and current collection. Examples of structural LiB cathodes (LiCoO 2 ) ( Pereira et al, 2007 ; Liu et al, 2009 ; Roberts and Aglietti, 2010 ; Javaid and Ali, 2018 ), lithium iron phosphate (LiFePO 4 ) ( Snyder et al, 2006 ; Ekstedt et al, 2010 ; Carlson, 2013 ; Hagberg et al, 2018 ; Bouton et al, 2019 ; Moyer et al, 2020b ), and lithium nickel manganese cobalt oxide (NMC) ( Ladpli et al, 2019 ). LiCoO 2 electrodes are a popular choice for use with mobile devices such as smartphones, laptops, and digital cameras ( Liu et al, 2015 ).…”

Section: Current Statusmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Designing Structural Electrochemical Energy Storage Systems: A Perspective on the Role of Device Chemistry

Navarro‐Suárez

Shaffer

2022

Front. Chem.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Structural energy storage devices (SESDs), designed to simultaneously store electrical energy and withstand mechanical loads, offer great potential to reduce the overall system weight in applications such as automotive, aircraft, spacecraft, marine and sports equipment. The greatest improvements will come from systems that implement true multifunctional materials as fully as possible. The realization of electrochemical SESDs therefore requires the identification and development of suitable multifunctional structural electrodes, separators, and electrolytes. Different strategies are available depending on the class of electrochemical energy storage device and the specific chemistries selected. Here, we review existing attempts to build SESDs around carbon fiber (CF) composite electrodes, including the use of both organic and inorganic compounds to increase electrochemical performance. We consider some of the key challenges and discuss the implications for the selection of device chemistries.

show abstract

Section: Current Statusmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Current Statusmentioning

confidence: 99%

Designing Structural Electrochemical Energy Storage Systems: A Perspective on the Role of Device Chemistry

Navarro‐Suárez

Shaffer

2022

Front. Chem.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The promising results on the application of PAN-based fibers as anodes for power composites has recently pushed a small number of research groups to investigate the possibility of manufacturing carbon fiber-based cathode current collectors. The first attempt was carried out by Hagberg et al [ 62 ] who used an electrophoretic deposition (EPD) technique to deposit active electrode material on carbon fiber substrate. In this work, unsized Hexcel AS4 PAN-based fibers were covered with carbon black (CB)-coated LiFePO 4 (LFP) particles with a specific capacity of 150 mA h/g.…”

Section: Multifunctional Materialsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Structural Batteries: A Review

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Structural power composites stand out as a possible solution to the demands of the modern transportation system of more efficient and eco-friendly vehicles. Recent studies demonstrated the possibility to realize these components endowing high-performance composites with electrochemical properties. The aim of this paper is to present a systematic review of the recent developments on this more and more sensitive topic. Two main technologies will be covered here: (1) the integration of commercially available lithium-ion batteries in composite structures, and (2) the fabrication of carbon fiber-based multifunctional materials. The latter will be deeply analyzed, describing how the fibers and the polymeric matrices can be synergistically combined with ionic salts and cathodic materials to manufacture monolithic structural batteries. The main challenges faced by these emerging research fields are also addressed. Among them, the maximum allowable curing cycle for the embedded configuration and the realization that highly conductive structural electrolytes for the monolithic solution are noteworthy. This work also shows an overview of the multiphysics material models developed for these studies and provides a clue for a possible alternative configuration based on solid-state electrolytes.

show abstract

“…The positive electrodes are considered to be based on carbon fibres, which in this case act as reinforcement and current collectors. The carbon fibres in the positive electrode are coated with lithium iron phosphate (LiFePO 4 ) [15], providing electrochemical storage, as well as a binder and carbon black for electrical contact.…”

Section: Structural Battery Designmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The positive electrode was made of carbon fibres coated with LiFePO 4 , Polyvinylidenfluoride (PVDF) binder, and carbon black. The coating process was an electrophoretic deposition (EPD) as presented by Hagberg et al [15] and used a bath of acetone, iodine, and a surfactant, Triton X-100. The EPD process, including ultrasonication, needed 1 kJ electricity per gram of coated fibre.…”

Section: Production Of the Structural Batterymentioning

confidence: 99%

Prospective Life Cycle Assessment of a Structural Battery

Zackrisson¹,

Jönsson²,

Johannisson

et al. 2019

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

With increasing interest in reducing fossil fuel emissions, more and more development is focused on electric mobility. For electric vehicles, the main challenge is the mass of the batteries, which significantly increase the mass of the vehicles and limits their range. One possible concept to solve this is incorporating structural batteries; a structural material that both stores electrical energy and carries mechanical load. The concept envisions constructing the body of an electric vehicle with this material and thus reducing the need for further energy storage. This research is investigating a future structural battery that is incorporated in the roof of an electric vehicle. The structural battery is replacing the original steel roof of the vehicle, and part of the original traction battery. The environmental implications of this structural battery roof are investigated with a life cycle assessment, which shows that a structural battery roof can avoid climate impacts in substantive quantities. The main emissions for the structural battery stem from its production and efforts should be focused there to further improve the environmental benefits of the structural battery. Toxicity is investigated with a novel chemical risk assessment from a life cycle perspective, which shows that two chemicals should be targeted for substitution.

show abstract

Lithium iron phosphate coated carbon fiber electrodes for structural lithium ion batteries

Cited by 105 publications

References 35 publications

Designing Structural Electrochemical Energy Storage Systems: A Perspective on the Role of Device Chemistry

Designing Structural Electrochemical Energy Storage Systems: A Perspective on the Role of Device Chemistry

Structural Batteries: A Review

Prospective Life Cycle Assessment of a Structural Battery

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About