2002
DOI: 10.1093/clinchem/48.11.2055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liver Fatty Acid-binding Protein as a Sensitive Serum Marker of Acute Hepatocellular Damage in Liver Transplant Recipients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
49
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
6
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hepatocyte damage results in FABP1 detection in blood (27) and has been proposed as a sensitive serum marker of hepatocellular damage in LT recipients. (28) Recently, FABP1 has been shown to be a diagnostic marker of liver injury in patients with hepatitis C infection (29) and to be associated with drug-induced liver injury. (30) However, to date FABP1 has not been evaluated as a prognostic marker in these conditions or ALF.…”
Section: Comparison With the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hepatocyte damage results in FABP1 detection in blood (27) and has been proposed as a sensitive serum marker of hepatocellular damage in LT recipients. (28) Recently, FABP1 has been shown to be a diagnostic marker of liver injury in patients with hepatitis C infection (29) and to be associated with drug-induced liver injury. (30) However, to date FABP1 has not been evaluated as a prognostic marker in these conditions or ALF.…”
Section: Comparison With the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(27) Furthermore, alphaglutathione S-transferase has also been proposed as a potential biomarker of hepatocyte damage; however, its larger size (26 kDa) and relatively higher expression in kidney and intestine reduce its sensitivity and specificity. (28) Due to its low molecular mass, FABP1 levels in the serum are influenced by both renal function and RRT. FABP1 is present in significantly smaller quantities in the kidney (proximal tubules).…”
Section: Comparison With the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…ALAT levels peaked on the first post-operative day, at the same time and in the same range as reported by other groups (19,20), whereas L-FABP levels reached their maximum values at the end of surgery and rapidly decreased thereafter. This might be a reflection of the fact that L-FABP is a more direct and sensitive marker for the detection of liver cell damage as compared with ALAT, because of the small molecular mass and short half-life of L-FABP (16,17,21).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extent of hepatocellular damage was assessed by plasma concentrations of L-FABP and aminotransferases. L-FABP is a sensitive marker for the detection of liver cell damage (16,17). L-FABP levels were determined using a commercially available ELISA (Hycult Biotechnology, Uden, the Netherlands).…”
Section: Hepatocellular Damagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, after acute myocardial infarction, H-FABP was released into the plasma of patients, where it was detected 1.5 h after injury [13]. Intestinal-type (I-) FABP in serum was shown to serve as a marker for small intestine allograft rejection [14], and L-FABP was reported to be a marker in serum for acute hepatocellular damage in liver transplantation [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%