2005
DOI: 10.1007/s10957-005-6537-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local Convergence of an Inexact-Restoration Method and Numerical Experiments

Abstract: Local convergence of an inexact-restoration method for nonlinear programming is proved. Numerical experiments are performed with the objective of evaluating the behavior of the purely local method against a globally convergent nonlinear-programming algorithm.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
49
1
8

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
49
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Another formulation [17] solves a minimization problem where the objective function is replaced by its Lagrangian function:…”
Section: Inexact Restoration Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another formulation [17] solves a minimization problem where the objective function is replaced by its Lagrangian function:…”
Section: Inexact Restoration Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the minimization phase we compute a trial point belonging to π k solving a trust-region subproblem such that the functional value at the trial point is less than the functional value at the restored point. A Lagrangian function can be also used at the minimization phase as it is presented in [16,17]. By means of a merit function, the new iterate is accepted or rejected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly, this procedure produces severe simplex deformations which impair its chances of practical convergence. However, the idea of using decreasing infeasibility tolerances is quite valuable and has been employed in several modern methods for constrained (not necessarily derivative-free) optimization [7,9,16,23,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method belongs to the class of two-phase trust-region methods, e.g., Byrd, Schnabel, and Shultz [3], Dennis, El-Alem, and Maciel [6], Gomes, Maciel, and Martínez [13], Gould and Toint [15], Lalee, Nocedal, and Plantenga [17], Omojokun [21], and Powell and Yuan [23]. Also, our method, since it deals with two steps, can be classified in the area of inexact restoration methods proposed by Martínez, e.g., [1,2,8,18,19,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%