2016
DOI: 10.1002/mma.3863
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local well‐posedness for a system of quadratic nonlinear Schrödinger equations in one or two dimensions

Abstract: In this article, the local well‐posedness of Cauchy's problem is explored for a system of quadratic nonlinear Schrödinger equations in the space Lp(Rn). In a special case of mass resonant 2 × 2 system, it is well known that this problem is well posed in Hs(s≥0) and ill posed in Hs(s < 0) in two‐space dimensions. By translation on a linear semigroup, we show that the general system becomes locally well posed in Lp(R2) for 1 < p < 2, for which p can arbitrarily be close to the scaling limit pc=1. In one‐dimensio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Inspired by these works we intent to provide sufficient conditions on the interactions terms, f k , to study the dynamics of system (1.1). General nonlinearities with quadratic interactions were considered for example in references [26], [25] and [40]. These works were dedicated to the study the Cauchy problem in two dimensions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Inspired by these works we intent to provide sufficient conditions on the interactions terms, f k , to study the dynamics of system (1.1). General nonlinearities with quadratic interactions were considered for example in references [26], [25] and [40]. These works were dedicated to the study the Cauchy problem in two dimensions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we consider system (1.1) in dimensions 1 ≤ n ≤ 6. Also, it is important to mention that our nonlinearities include the ones considered in [26] and [40]. However, in our work no explicit form is assumed on the interaction terms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%