2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.05.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Localization of human supratemporal auditory areas from intracerebral auditory evoked potentials using distributed source models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
94
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
12
94
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The corresponding locations in the right hemisphere are numerically indistinguishable. The difference in ECD location observed in the left hemisphere could reflect a subtle difference in the distributions of neural activity occurring within overlapping regions of the STG, leading to differently estimated locations for the modeled sources (44).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The corresponding locations in the right hemisphere are numerically indistinguishable. The difference in ECD location observed in the left hemisphere could reflect a subtle difference in the distributions of neural activity occurring within overlapping regions of the STG, leading to differently estimated locations for the modeled sources (44).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that the N1 and P2 activities are likely generated by several cortical sources and were not confined to one point as reported here. For example, a recent study by Yvert et al [27], where distributed source model was used to localize the N1 activity applied to intracranial recordings, suggested a more distributed activity for the N1 wave, which spanned Heschl's gyrus and sulcus, planum temporale, and superior temporal gyrus. Discrete modeling of these activities (used here) may reflect the location of the center of mass of all generators, biased toward the predominant contributor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the modulation of the positive auditory component peaking Ïł120 ms is the analog of the auditory N1 decrease found in scalp ERPs using the exact same experimental paradigm (Besle et al, 2004b). This component is recorded with a positive polarity in intracranial data, because electrodes are located under the supratemporal cortical surface (Godey et al, 2001;Yvert et al, 2005). Modulation of earlier auditory components and visual responses in auditory cortex were not observed on the scalp, probably because they are All latencies (in ms) are measured relative to the auditory syllable onset; 600Ï© indicates that the response continues after 600 ms.…”
Section: Two Forms Of Audiovisual Interaction In the Secondary Auditomentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Some 10 milliseconds later, the superior temporal cortex was activated with a spatial profile very similar to that of the transient auditory components peaking Ïł65 or 120 ms at the same electrode. Because these transient auditory components are known to be generated in the auditory cortex (LiĂ©geois-Chauvel et al, 1994;Yvert et al, 2005), this visual response was thus probably also generated in the auditory cortex. Those first two types of visual responses (in MT/V5 and in auditory cortex) occurred well before visual activations in other parts of the brain (at least those investigated in the study).…”
Section: Direct Feedforward Visual Activation Of the Secondary Auditomentioning
confidence: 99%