2007
DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.12-11-1309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: What Is the Evidence for Induction Chemoradiation?

Abstract: Disclosure: R.G.-J. has received honoraria for lectures and advisory boards and has been supported in attending international meetings by Merck, Pfizer, Sanofi-Aventis, and Roche. He has also received unrestricted grants for research from Merck, SanofiAventis, and Roche. M.H. has received honoraria for lectures and advisory boards and has been supported in attending international meetings by Merck, Astra-Zeneca, Pfizer, Sanofi-Aventis, and Roche. LEARNING OBJECTIVESAfter completing this course, the reader will… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
30
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Then a representative from each centre was asked to identify which of three neoadjuvant options (no neo-adjuvant therapy, short-course radiotherapy 25 Gy over five fractions or long-course chemoradiotherapy) he ⁄ she would use for a rectal cancer in the upper, middle or lower third of the rectum staged by MRI as being T 2 -T 4 and ⁄ or N 0 -N 2 . Representatives from all four centres agreed that preoperative staging is best achieved by using MRI scan and that the threat of local recurrence is the greatest from locally advanced cancers in the lower third of the rectum [23]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Then a representative from each centre was asked to identify which of three neoadjuvant options (no neo-adjuvant therapy, short-course radiotherapy 25 Gy over five fractions or long-course chemoradiotherapy) he ⁄ she would use for a rectal cancer in the upper, middle or lower third of the rectum staged by MRI as being T 2 -T 4 and ⁄ or N 0 -N 2 . Representatives from all four centres agreed that preoperative staging is best achieved by using MRI scan and that the threat of local recurrence is the greatest from locally advanced cancers in the lower third of the rectum [23]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…This consensus is maintained in cases of lower third T 3a N 0 cancers. All four oncologists agreed that the histopathological finding of positive lymph nodes or -even worse -a positive circumferential margin after resection of an MRI-defined high-risk rectal cancer represents a significant lost therapeutic opportunity [23]. However, short-course radiotherapy alone or even no neo-adjuvant therapy is likely to be prescribed if the tumour is early (T 2 , N 0 ) and ⁄ or situated in the upper third of the rectum.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Resectable LARC is defined more strictly as tumors with penetration through the entire rectal wall, or with evidence of involved pelvic nodes, but still a non-threatened CRM based upon preoperative MRI and without distant metastasis (3), whereas non-resectable LARC usually comprises fixed tumors for which surgery is not possible without leaving tumor tissue within the pelvis. The latter tumors may after neoadjuvant treatment become resectable (17).…”
Section: Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer -Larcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also speculated whether NACT also induce shrinkage of primary tumor, thereby improving resectability and CRT response (202). For this reason the term "induction chemotherapy" has been proposed (17). However, NACT will delay both CRT and surgery, and in the case of cervical and head-and-nech cancer, NACT consistently failed to show any benefits in clinical trials (202).…”
Section: Chemotherapy Without Rtmentioning
confidence: 99%