2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.10.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term and penalty contracts in a two-stage supply chain with stochastic demand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Gurnani and Gerchak (2007) consider a contract form whereby the component supplier with worse delivery performance pays an extra penalty to the assembly firm. Frascatore and Mahmoodi (2008) consider the case that the supplier must pay a fee if its capacity is too low to meet the buyer's order.…”
Section: Contract Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Gurnani and Gerchak (2007) consider a contract form whereby the component supplier with worse delivery performance pays an extra penalty to the assembly firm. Frascatore and Mahmoodi (2008) consider the case that the supplier must pay a fee if its capacity is too low to meet the buyer's order.…”
Section: Contract Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Supply chain collaboration is the mutual effort of all node enterprises to coordinate the supply chain [24]. Frascatore and Mahmoodi [25] explored the collaboration and penalty contract in a two-stage supply chain composed of manufacturers and suppliers, revealing that penalty contract can promote supply chain collaboration more effectively than long-term contract. From the angle of knowledge innovation, Samaddar and Kadiyala [26] analyzed the coordination mechanism of resource sharing in cross-organizational supply chain.…”
Section: Supply Chain Collaborationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frascatore(2003) consider the two-stage supply chain coordination problem with long-term and penalty contracts, which is composed of a manufacturer and a supplier.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%