2011
DOI: 10.1080/00063657.2011.603289
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term changes in numbers and distribution of wintering waterbirds in the Czech Republic, 1966–2008

Abstract: Capsule Of 26 species of wintering waterbirds, 18 showed an increase in numbers, five showed a decrease and two showed no change. Aim To assess long-term trends in the numbers and distribution of the 26 most abundant wintering waterbird species in the Czech Republic. Methods We used International Waterbird Census data from between 48 and 639 wetland sites which had been counted annually in the Czech Republic from 1966 to 2008. From these data long-term changes in numbers and distributions were determined. Log-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Th is complements the results of Visser et al (2009), whereby species breeding in open and dry environments showed the strongest reduction in their migration distance. However, the lack of certainty in our results mean that these trends warrant further investigation, especially into whether wetter winter weather or artifi cial feeding grounds such as agricultural fi elds in inland Europe might be motivating coastal species to shift southward during winter (Rend ó n et al 2008, Musil et al 2011.…”
Section: Ev-7mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Th is complements the results of Visser et al (2009), whereby species breeding in open and dry environments showed the strongest reduction in their migration distance. However, the lack of certainty in our results mean that these trends warrant further investigation, especially into whether wetter winter weather or artifi cial feeding grounds such as agricultural fi elds in inland Europe might be motivating coastal species to shift southward during winter (Rend ó n et al 2008, Musil et al 2011.…”
Section: Ev-7mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…There are probably some differences in the two species' foraging strategies for example with respect to preferred depth of water for hunting, preference for stagnant or running water, but these differences are probably only detectable during breeding season (when cormorants usually hunt on larger, deeper, stagnant waters, including coastal waters, whilst goosanders often forage on shallow, running inland waters) (Ross 1977;Sjöberg 1985Sjöberg , 1988Wood and Hand 1985;Marquiss and Carss 1994;Dirksen et al 1995;Van Dobben 1995;Gibbons and Withers 2006;Carss et al 2012). Outside the breeding season, there are probably no differences in foraging habits, as during migration and wintering both species forage on various waters, from the open sea to inland rivers, lakes, and ponds (Gilissen et al 2002;Musil et al 2011). Of course weather and type of water affected the distribution and numbers of both species, but these factors did not explain the local distribution of flocks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The trends found in this study were compared to similar analyses available for a range of other European countries: Bulgaria (Michev and Profirov 2003), Sweden (Nilsson 2008), Ireland , the Netherlands (Hustings et al 2009), France (Fouque et al 2009), the UK (Calbrade et al 2010), Portugal (Catry et al 2011), the Czech Republic (Musil et al 2011), Denmark, Germany and the Netherlands (Wadden Sea; Van Roomen et al 2012), and as found in this study, the number of increasing species was higher than the number of decreasing species in Bulgaria, Sweden, the Netherlands (part), France, the UK and the Czech Republic. In contrast, decreasing species were in the majority in the Irish and Wadden Sea (German/Danish/Dutch) studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several analyses of long-term trends of wintering waterbirds have been carried out in Europe, at a national, regional or site-specific level (e.g. Laursen and Frikke 2006;Crowe et al 2008;Maclean et al 2008;Nilsson 2008;Fouque et al 2009;Musil et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%