2015
DOI: 10.4401/ag-6735
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long term continuous radon monitoring in a seismically active area

Abstract: We present the results of a long term, continuous radon monitoring experiment started in April 2010 in a seismically active area, affected during the 2010-2013 data acquisition time window by an intense micro seismic activity and by several small seismic events. We employed both correlation and cross-correlation analyses in order to investigate possible relationship existing between the collected radon data, seismic events and meteorological parameters. Our results do not support the feasibility of a robust on… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study is a more deterministic approach to the forecast with respect to the presently available purely probabilistic OEF models because it is more heavily based on the analysis of precursors in real time and offline. The Italian radon monitoring network of soil radon emission [2,3] or the continuous monitoring of soil CO 2 in Japan [4] are examples of such an approach. This does not exclude statistical analysis such as the detection of hydrogeochemical seismic precursors [5] or uncertainty evaluation in seismic risk assessments [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study is a more deterministic approach to the forecast with respect to the presently available purely probabilistic OEF models because it is more heavily based on the analysis of precursors in real time and offline. The Italian radon monitoring network of soil radon emission [2,3] or the continuous monitoring of soil CO 2 in Japan [4] are examples of such an approach. This does not exclude statistical analysis such as the detection of hydrogeochemical seismic precursors [5] or uncertainty evaluation in seismic risk assessments [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since gases, either dissolved in groundwater systems or as free gas phase emanating from fumarolic discharges, are highly mobile, it is possible that they can respond to even small crustal disturbances associated with seismicity. In this respect, several studies have mainly concentrated on the periodic and/or real-time monitoring of gas compositions, including concentrations of radon (Rn), carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), hydrogen sulfide (H 2 S), methane (CH 4 ), hydrogen (H 2 ), helium (He), gas concentration ratios (N 2 (Nitrogen)/Ar(Argon), He/Ar, CH 4 /Ar, H 2 /Ar, CO 2 /CH 4 ) , isotopic compositions ( 3 He/ 4 He, 13 C/ 12 C), and gas fluxes (Sugisaki 1978;Kawabe 1984;Reimer 1984;Hilton 1996;Sugisaki et al 1996;Sano et al 1998;Ito et al 1999;Colangello et al 2005;Weinlich et al 2006;Yang et al 2006;Cioni et al 2007;Einarsson et al 2008;Padron et al 2008;Miyakawa et al 2010;Brauer et al 2011;Ghosh et al 2011;Chaudhuri et al 2013;Umeda et al 2013;Aydın et al 2015;Piersanti et al 2015;Chowdhury et al 2017). Increasing or decreasing gas signals, which were mainly defined as "geochemical anomalies" observed in relation to local and/or regional earthquakes, were reported by such studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%