2015
DOI: 10.3109/09593985.2015.1070938
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term effects of an intensive interventional training program based on activities for individuals with spinal cord injury: a pilot study

Abstract: For trained individuals with chronic SCIs, classified "A" according to the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA), an ABT program did not significantly affect the scores of the scales used to assess quality of life (SF-36) and functional independence (FIM).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
5
1
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
5
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The results showed no neurological recovery after ABT and no significant differences between groups for functional or behavioural variables. 43 Similarly, a case series conducted by Padula et al 44 investigated the long-term effects of an 18-month multimodal ABT program and showed no effects of ABT on activities of daily living or participation outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results showed no neurological recovery after ABT and no significant differences between groups for functional or behavioural variables. 43 Similarly, a case series conducted by Padula et al 44 investigated the long-term effects of an 18-month multimodal ABT program and showed no effects of ABT on activities of daily living or participation outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, improved PQOL occurred in patients undergoing 12 weeks of FES ambulation training despite no change in depression [29] . Nevertheless, in persons with complete SCI, 18 months of incorporation of ABT into daily activities had no effect on functional independence or quality of life (measured with the Short Form-36) [45] . Jones et al [23] reported no change in quality of life despite increased walking speed in men and women with incomplete SCI undergoing six months of ABT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Small clinically significant improvement in the SCIM score has been defined as four points, and substantial clinical improvement has been defined as ten points on the SCIM scale [29]. Other studies also failed to show significant improvements in independence after ABT [30]. This is unexpected, since SCIM scores correlate well with assessments of hand and arm motor strength and capacity [3133].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%