2016
DOI: 10.1186/s13019-016-0416-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term results of minimally invasive stand-alone bi-atrial surgical ablation with a bipolar ablation device for persistent and longstanding persistent AF: a single-center case series of 91 patients

Abstract: BackgroundMinimally invasive surgical treatment of lone atrial fibrillation (AF) is an alternative for AF that is refractory to medical treatment. We present long-term results of standalone surgical ablation of AF using a bipolar ablation device in 91 consecutive patients.MethodsThis was an observational, retrospective study of 91 patients (77 % males; mean age, 53 ± 10 years [range, 23–75 years]) who underwent minimally invasive standalone surgical ablation of persistent and longstanding persistent AF using a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite all new insights and development in clinical practice, long‐term rhythm control in patients with AF remains a major challenge, particularly for patients with (long‐standing) persistent and postablation AF. Past studies that have focused on long‐term rhythm outcome after (hybrid) thoracoscopic ablation have reported success rates varying between 38% and 83% up to 5 years, depending on follow‐up duration, AF subtype (paroxysmal vs nonparoxysmal) and antiarrhythmic drug usage, as shown in Table . As can be observed from this quick overview, the 60% success rate in our study is similar to what most of these studies have reported and confirms the steady reasonable results after thoracoscopic AF ablation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Despite all new insights and development in clinical practice, long‐term rhythm control in patients with AF remains a major challenge, particularly for patients with (long‐standing) persistent and postablation AF. Past studies that have focused on long‐term rhythm outcome after (hybrid) thoracoscopic ablation have reported success rates varying between 38% and 83% up to 5 years, depending on follow‐up duration, AF subtype (paroxysmal vs nonparoxysmal) and antiarrhythmic drug usage, as shown in Table . As can be observed from this quick overview, the 60% success rate in our study is similar to what most of these studies have reported and confirms the steady reasonable results after thoracoscopic AF ablation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Totally thoracoscopic epicardial ablation has evolved over the last decade towards a successful and safe minimally invasive rhythm control strategy, with a Class 2A indication, for patients with symptomatic drug refractory (long‐standing) persistent and postablation atrial fibrillation (AF) . The procedure is associated with a 79% freedom from AF after 2 years, but evidence for long‐term durability is still limited with reported success rates varying between 38% and 83% after a follow‐up up to 5 years . In addition, AF is associated with threefold to fivefold higher stroke rates, but information on the long‐term stroke risk after thoracoscopic ablation remains limited to a few studies reporting a low cerebrovascular event rate .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Výběr pacientů v obou přehledech byl z hlediska našeho článku vyhovující -články s překrývajícími se soubory pacientů byly vyřazeny, články s příliš malými počty nemocných též. Do výběru byly přidány další tři velmi nedávné vhodné články, které v přehledech nebyly zahrnuty [36][37][38]. Ne všechny články bohužel obsahovaly sdělení, že komplikace byly defi novány podle plat-Material and methods: All perioperative and 30-day complications of thoracoscopic ablations of AF performed in our center were collected and analyzed.…”
Section: Metodyunclassified
“…The data on long-term durability regarding the contribution of GP and LoM mapping and ablation compared to PV isolation have been minimal. 16 19 The ongoing Catheter Ablation vs Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation trial (CABANA) will report whether pulmonary vein isolation catheter ablation versus either rate or rhythm control by medical therapy is superior for the elimination of AF or whether catheter ablation decreases 5-year outcomes of mortality, disabling stroke, bleeding, or cardiac arrest in AF patients (Douglas Packer; Mayo Clinic; https://ClinicalTrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00911508 ).…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%