2010
DOI: 10.1080/13602381003637609
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long- versus short-term orientation: new perspectives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

11
397
0
11

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 530 publications
(419 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
11
397
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Posteriormente y con datos proporcionados inicialmente por investigaciones independientes, Hofstede agregó a su formulación dos dimensiones: una quinta dimensión, denominada orientación a corto plazo frente a largo plazo, y una sexta, denominada indulgencia frente a contención (Hofstede, 1991;Hofstede & Minkov, 2010;Minkov, 2007). Estas dos últimas dimensiones no han sido utilizadas por los investigadores con la misma cobertura de las dimensiones del modelo original.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Posteriormente y con datos proporcionados inicialmente por investigaciones independientes, Hofstede agregó a su formulación dos dimensiones: una quinta dimensión, denominada orientación a corto plazo frente a largo plazo, y una sexta, denominada indulgencia frente a contención (Hofstede, 1991;Hofstede & Minkov, 2010;Minkov, 2007). Estas dos últimas dimensiones no han sido utilizadas por los investigadores con la misma cobertura de las dimensiones del modelo original.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…In the original study, Hofstede presented four dimensions of culture (see table 1) [20]. In later works, Hofstede added a fifth dimension: long-term versus short-term orientation [22]. However, data on this dimension are only available for a much smaller number of countries, and no data are available for Denmark.…”
Section: Hofstede's Dimensions Of National Culturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analyses have later been extended to other types of organisations and countries, and covered 76 countries by 2010 [22]. In the original study, Hofstede presented four dimensions of culture (see table 1) [20].…”
Section: Hofstede's Dimensions Of National Culturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other five independent variables all pertained to Hofstede's cultural dimensions, and were defined as the following: a) individualism-collectivism-the extent to which society members identify themselves as individuals versus group members; (b) power distance-the degree to which society members anticipate and accept the distribution of power; (c) masculinity-femininity-differences in attitudes toward societal roles between the two sexes; (d) uncertainty avoidance-the self-programming of societies towards dealing with ambiguity and uncertainty; and, (e) long-short orientation-relative differences in significance of perseverance, thrift, and respect for tradition, which was also otherwise referred to as Confucian dynamism (de Mooij and Hofstede, , 2011Hofstede, 1981Hofstede, , 1984Hofstede, , 1994Hofstede, , 1998aHofstede, , 1998bHofstede, , 2001Hofstede, , 2009Hofstede and Bond, 1988; Hofstede and Hofstede, n.d.; Hofstede and Minkov, 2010). The underlying construct of culture can be defined as "the collective programming of the human mind that distinguishes the members of one human group from those of another.…”
Section: Independent Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%