1993
DOI: 10.2307/1939523
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Longevity of Fallen Epiphytes in a Neotropical Montane Forest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
56
0
3

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
56
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…We treated the individual plant as the independent sample unit (regardless of the mat or tree of origin), because a previous study in Monteverde on epiphyte survivorship showed that there was no effect of tree or mat on epiphyte longevity (Matelson et al 1993). In that study, epiphyte longevity was normally distributed, and there was no effect of epiphyte attachment to particular mats (t-test, P<0.35), and no significant regressions of longevity on mat volume (r 2 =0.04, P<0.19) or number of plants per mat (r 2 =0.01, P<0.64).…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We treated the individual plant as the independent sample unit (regardless of the mat or tree of origin), because a previous study in Monteverde on epiphyte survivorship showed that there was no effect of tree or mat on epiphyte longevity (Matelson et al 1993). In that study, epiphyte longevity was normally distributed, and there was no effect of epiphyte attachment to particular mats (t-test, P<0.35), and no significant regressions of longevity on mat volume (r 2 =0.04, P<0.19) or number of plants per mat (r 2 =0.01, P<0.64).…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These patterns have been described in long-term canopy and ecosystem studies in Monteverde, Costa Rica, using descriptive and experimental approaches (Nadkarni et al 2000a(Nadkarni et al , 2000b. Indicators that epiphytes and their accompanying canopy dead organic matter influence ecosystem nutrient cycles in the Monteverde forest include their high biomass (Nadkarni et al 2000b), the high capacity of nonvascular epiphytes to absorb atmospheric NO 3 -and NH 4 + (Clark et al 1998), the contribution of epiphyte litterfall to total fine litterfall (Nadkarni and Matelson 1992), and the slow rates of death and decomposition of epiphytes that have fallen to the forest floor (Matelson et al 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It primarily grows epiphytically in the canopy of old growth lowland forests with high rainfall (Oliver 1930;Burrows 1999) but also in coastal cliff and rocky habitats (Oliver 1930;Cockayne 1958;Wardle 1991;Burrows 1999). Epiphytic habitats are often described as severe because of high insolation, vapour pressure deficits and wind speeds as well as fluctuating water and nutrient supplies, and poor physical stability (Benzing 1990;Matelson et al 1993;Holbrook & Putz 1996). These rigorous conditions are also present in the terrestrial and rupestral habitats of G. lucida.…”
Section: Environmental Requirements and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%