Looking Beyond Intellectual Property in Resolving Protection of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Indigenous Peoples

Paterson, Robert K.; Karjala, Dennis S.

doi:10.4324/9781315252391-15

Cited by 8 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The commodification of intangible cultural and intellectual property such as music, motifs, prayers, ceremonies, and traditional knowledge as well as the alarming issue of "biopiracy" 4 has been frustrating to many Indigenous communities (Daes, 1995;Robinson, 2010). The current legal frameworks have been inadequate in protecting Indigenous cultural and intellectual property (Paterson & Karjala, 2003). The modes of classification, identification, and operation used under the current IP system of European origins (Deazley, 2004) are not compatible with Indigenous peoples' understanding of their knowledge and cultural practices (Bell & Napolean, 2008).…”

Section: Biocultural Rights: a New Paradigm For Protecting Natural Anmentioning

confidence: 99%

Biocultural Rights: A New Paradigm for Protecting Natural and Cultural Resources of Indigenous Communities

Chen

Gilmore

2015

iipj

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article proposes a new concept of “biocultural rights” that justly reflects a broader intellectual and policy trend to holistically address the protection of Indigenous natural and cultural resources. The concept of biocultural rights combines nature with culture; takes into consideration the past, the present, and the future; and values “special” Indigenous elements that are indispensable to the diversity of our universe. It aims at protecting Indigenous resources holistically and more effectively.

show abstract

Section: Biocultural Rights: a New Paradigm For Protecting Natural Anmentioning

confidence: 99%

Biocultural Rights: A New Paradigm for Protecting Natural and Cultural Resources of Indigenous Communities

Chen

Gilmore

2015

iipj

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The topic of privacy and security is critical to the engineering of any framework designed in the digital age and which, by itself, deserves a designated part of the theoretical groundwork. More related work on this topic for ICH can be found in [19,[35][36][37][38].…”

Section: Ich Privacy Issues For Individuals and The Communitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Capturing the City’s Heritage On-the-Go: Design Requirements for Mobile Crowdsourced Cultural Heritage

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Intangible Cultural Heritage is at a continuous risk of extinction. Where historical artefacts engine the machinery of intercontinental mass-tourism, socio-technical changes are reshaping the anthropomorphic landscapes everywhere on the globe, at an unprecedented rate. There is an increasing urge to tap into the hidden semantics and the anecdotes surrounding people, memories and places. The vast cultural knowledge made of testimony, oral history and traditions constitutes a rich cultural ontology tying together human beings, times, and situations. Altogether, these complex, multidimensional features make the task of data-mapping of intangible cultural heritage a problem of sustainability and preservation. This paper addresses a suggested route for conceiving, designing and appraising a digital framework intended to support the conservation of the intangible experience, from a user and a collective-centred perspective. The framework is designed to help capture the intangible cultural value of all places exhibiting cultural-historical significance, supported by an extensive analysis of the literature. We present a set of design recommendations for designing mobile apps that are intended to converge crowdsourcing to Intangible Cultural Heritage.

show abstract

“…53 Brian Patterson dan Dennis Karjala mengatakan bahwa penegakan hukum di bidang HKI menggunakan pendekatan kepentingan umum (public-benefit). 54 Pendekatan public-benefit atau instrumentalist membutuhkan pembentukan aturan yang dapat menyeimbangkan antara perlindungan yang berkaitan dengan kekayaan intelektual di satu sisi dan kebebasan berkarya di sisi lainnya. 55 Jika suatu merek kemungkinannya akan menimbulkan kerugian bagi masyarakat pada umumnya, merek tersebut ditolak pendaftarannya.…”

Section: Model Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Bad Faith Dalam Pendaftaran Merekunclassified

Iktikad Tidak Baik Dalam Pendaftaran Dan Model Penegakan Hukum Merek Di Indonesia

Fajar

Nurhayati

Ifrani

2018

iustum

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Trade mark not only functions as an identity but also contains economic value so there are many efforts regarding bad-faith trademark registration. This study aimed to find the concept of bad-faith registration and to know the law enforcement in Indonesia. This was a normative legal research, with statute approach, conceptual approach, and case approach. The results of the study showed that: first, the concept of badfaith has been regulated in

show abstract

Looking Beyond Intellectual Property in Resolving Protection of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Indigenous Peoples

Cited by 8 publications

References 0 publications

Biocultural Rights: A New Paradigm for Protecting Natural and Cultural Resources of Indigenous Communities

Biocultural Rights: A New Paradigm for Protecting Natural and Cultural Resources of Indigenous Communities

Capturing the City’s Heritage On-the-Go: Design Requirements for Mobile Crowdsourced Cultural Heritage

Iktikad Tidak Baik Dalam Pendaftaran Dan Model Penegakan Hukum Merek Di Indonesia

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About