2019
DOI: 10.1007/s40815-019-00611-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Loss Aversion Equilibrium of Bimatrix Games with Symmetric Triangular Fuzzy Payoffs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When consumers face uncertain trading decisions, they often have expectations about prices and compare realized prices with reference points. Numerous studies in psychology and economics have shown that decision-makers are keener on minimizing losses than maximizing gains relative to reference points [15][16][17][18]. Prospect theory holds that for lossaverse decision-makers, a certain amount of losses will bring them more pain than the same amount of gains will please them [19] (Tversky and Kahneman, 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When consumers face uncertain trading decisions, they often have expectations about prices and compare realized prices with reference points. Numerous studies in psychology and economics have shown that decision-makers are keener on minimizing losses than maximizing gains relative to reference points [15][16][17][18]. Prospect theory holds that for lossaverse decision-makers, a certain amount of losses will bring them more pain than the same amount of gains will please them [19] (Tversky and Kahneman, 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this version, a basic utility, a loss aversion coefficient and a reference point characterize the loss-aversion preference of decision makers: an outcome below the reference point are framed as a loss and its utility is from the basic utility by subtracting a disutility that is equal to this loss multiplied by the loss-aversion coefficient. Shalev's version has been received widespread attention in the field of game theory [24][25][26][27]. In particular, the value function and its variants that characterizes the loss-aversion preference of decision makers has been applied to supply chain decisions [28][29][30][31][32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2016, Yili's total investment in green production reached about 150 million yuan (http://inews.nmgnews.com.cn/system/2017/02/10/012265324.shtml). Furthermore, abundant works in both psychological and the economic literature show that decision-makers are more motivated to minimize losses (relative to a reference point) than to maximize gains [15][16][17][18][19]. Thus, a natural assumption is that manufacturers are loss-averse.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%