Aerobic organisms possess a number of often overlapping and well-characterized defenses against common oxidants such as superoxide and hydrogen peroxide. However, much less is known of mechanisms of defense against halogens such as chlorine compounds. Although chlorine-based oxidants may oxidize a number of cellular components, sulfhydryl groups are particularly reactive. We have, therefore, assessed the importance of intracellular glutathione in protection of Escherichia coli cells against hydrogen peroxide, hypochlorous acid, and chloramines. Employing a glutathione-deficient E. coli strain (JTG10) and an otherwise isogenic glutathione-sufficient E. coli strain (AB1157), we find that glutathione-deficient organisms are approximately twice as sensitive to killing by both hydrogen peroxide and chlorine compounds. However, the mode of protection by glutathione in these two cases appears to differ: exogenous glutathione added to glutathione-deficient E. coli in amounts equal to those which would be present in a similar suspension of the wild-type bacteria fully restored resistance of glutathione-deficient bacteria to chlorine-based oxidants but did not change resistance to hydrogen peroxide. Furthermore, in protection against chlorine compounds, oxidized glutathione is almost as effective as reduced glutathione, implying that the tripeptide and/or oxidized thiol undergo further reactions with chlorine compounds. Indeed, in vitro, 1 mol of reduced glutathione will react with ϳ3.5 to 4.0 mol of hypochlorous acid. We conclude that glutathione defends E. coli cells against attack by chlorine compounds and hydrogen peroxide but, in the case of the halogen compounds, does so nonenzymatically and sacrificially.Aerobic organisms have numerous and often redundant defenses against oxidants. The natural abundance of superoxide (O 2 Ϫ ) and hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ) makes superoxide dismutase, catalase, and peroxidases preeminently important oxidant defenses. These enzymatic systems, along with antioxidants such as tocopherols, retinoids, and ascorbate, provide effective protection against reasonable challenges with activated oxygen species. There are, however, other oxidants against which no obvious defenses are known. Important among these are the chlorine compounds hypochlorous acid (HOCl), monochloramine (NH 2 Cl), and taurine monochloramine, which are generated by mammalian neutrophils (10,20,27). Hypochlorous acid, in particular, is a strong electrophile and will oxidize a large number of biological molecules, especially those containing thiols, thioethers, and conjugated double bonds (5,25).Therefore, it is no surprise that both mammalian neutrophils and water treatment facilities use chlorine and its reactive derivatives as effective bactericides (22). In tests on dilute bacterial suspensions (free of other organics), HOCl has a 50% lethal dose (LD 50 ) of 0.2 to 3.0 M against most bacteria tested, and there is evidence that chlorine generated by the mammalian neutrophil myeloperoxidase (MPO)-H 2 O 2 -chloride syst...