Lost in translation? Culture, language and the role of the translator in international business

Abstract

If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information. About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.comEmerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company manages a portfolio of more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series volumes, as well as providing an extensive range of online products and additional customer resources and services.Emerald is both COUNTER 4 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive preservation. AbstractPurpose -Issues of language in international business have been the focus of a growing body of theoretical and empirical work. This paper aims to contribute to this literature, focusing specifically on issues of translation. The role of translator will vary depending on the language strategy adopted, with strategies linked to differing perspectives on language in international business -mechanical, cultural and political. The paper examines these perspectives through the lens of a specific problem for transnational communication -"untranslatable" words and concepts. Design/methodology/approach -Interviews were conducted with professional linguists (translators and interpreters) to explore how they dealt with issues of untranslatable but cultural salient words in their day-to-day work with international businesses, using the problems of translating the Farsi word tarouf into English as a case in point. Findings -The linguists agreed that tarouf was an untranslatable word, and described their strategies to deal with this problem. The commonest strategy was avoidance, stemming from linguists' concern to maintain their professional standing with clients, a finding which reflects an emerging emphasis on the importance of context and relationships for understanding inter-cultural communication.Practical implications -The study highlights the crucial role of the translator in international business, and draws attention to the potential for cross-cultural communication problems arising from mutual lack of awareness of culturally-salient but inherently untranslatable words or phrases. Social implications -Effective inter-cultural communication is an issue of great importance to wider society, and business has historically been the commonest site of such communication. The study highlights an issue of considerable importance for improving inter-cultural communications, contributing to a growing inter-disciplinary literature in this area. Originality/value -Much of the research on language in international business has focused on the emergence of English as a lingua franca, but the present study focuses on specific issues of translation and does so in an under-researched location, Iran. I...

Localize or local lies? The power of language and translation in the multinational corporation

“…The local language of Philippe's subsidiary was one of the EU's main languages and had a prestigious status among the languages used in ENOQ. In line with our findings, Blenkinsopp and Shademan Pajouh (2010) maintain that when material is translated into a prestigious language, less of the original text is retained. Philippe was also successful in issue selling by adding a topic on the president's agenda about the global strategy (Dutton and Ashford, 1993).…”

The Victorious English Language

“…Given our view of the hegemony of the English language and the effects of this hegemony, it needs to be formally recorded and acknowledged that this article, too, is bounded by the very processes it endeavors to capture: It is written in English and the interviews and data generation/interpretation occurred in English (see Janssens, Lambert, & Steyaert, 2004;Venuti, 2003, for extended discussion of translation in cultural and political contexts, in general; see Blenkinsopp & Shademan Pajouh, 2010, for translation and management/ business knowledge). In other words, the research process and its outcomes are imbued in the very symbolic and material power processes described, explained, and critiqued in this article: It (re)produces the status quo.…”

Corporate language: the blind spot of language policy? Reflections on France's Loi Toubon

“…However, research shows that the adoption of a common language must be the beginning, not the end, of a reflection on language management in every one of its aspects and particularly in terms of human resources management: recruitment, training and assignment (Marschan-Piekkari, Welch, & Welch, 1999b). Translation practices form an integral part of the reflection: translation, although potentially strategic in an international business context, is generally considered as an expedient and is resorted to on an ad hoc basis (Blenkinsopp & Pajouh, 2010;Janssens, Lambert, & Steyaert, 2004;Piekkari, Welch, Welch, Peltonen, & Vesa, 2013).…”