Low copy number of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) predicts worse prognosis in early-stage laryngeal cancer patients

Abstract

ObjectivesAlterations in mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) copy number have been widely reported in various human cancers, and been considered to be an important hallmark of cancers. However, little is known about the value of copy number variations of mtDNA in the prognostic evaluation of laryngeal cancer.Design and methodsUsing real-time quantitative PCR method, we investigated mtDNA copy number in a cohort of laryngeal cancers (n =204) and normal laryngeal tissues (n =40), and explored the association of variable mtDNA copy number with clinical outcomes of laryngeal cancer patients.ResultsOur data showed that the relative mean mtDNA content was higher in the laryngeal cancer patients (11.91 ± 4.35 copies) than the control subjects (4.72 ± 0.70 copies). Moreover, we found that mtDNA content was negatively associated with cigarette smoking (pack-years), tumor invasion, and TNM stage. Notably, variable mtDNA content did not affect overall survival of laryngeal cancer patients. However, when the patients were categorized into early-stage and late-stage tumor groups according to TNM stage, we found that low mtDNA content was strongly associated with poor survival in the former, but not in the latter.ConclusionsThe present study demonstrated that low mtDNA content was strongly correlated with some of clinicopathological characteristics, such as cigarette smoking, tumor invasion and TNM stage. In addition, we found a strong link between low mtDNA content and worse survival of the patients with early-stage tumors. Taken together, low copy number of mtDNA may be a useful poor prognostic factor for early-stage laryngeal cancer patients.Virtual slidesThe virtual slides for this article can be found here: http://www.diagnosticpathology.diagnomx.eu/vs/1841771572115955

Elevated mitochondrial DNA copy numbers in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A potential biomarker for predicting inferior survival

“…Although baseline mitochondrial DNA copy numbers in patients are increased in patients compared with controls, copy number did not correlate with any of the high‐risk clinicopathological variables. Studies on the prognostic value of mitochondrial DNA copy number reveal variability in the prognostic significance that seems primarily determined by the type of cancer concerned . In ALL, we observed a significant positive correlation between mitochondrial DNA copy number and one of the standard prognostic variables, that is, age.…”

Elevated Mitochondrial DNA Copy Number in Peripheral Blood and Tissue Predict the Opposite Outcome of Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

“…After a thorough review of titles and abstracts by two investigators independently, 394 studies were excluded and the full texts of remaining 26 references have also been artificial retrieved for further identification. Finally a total of 20 retrospective studies comprising 5413 patients were included in our study and 18 studies were used for analysis16171819202122252627282930313233343536. Among the included studies for analysis, there were 16 studies recruited Asian patients while 2 studies recruited Caucasian patients.…”

“…Three studies252735 reported mtDNA copy number as three categorical variables and all used middle level of mtDNA copy number as reference. All three studies recruited Asians and measured copy number in tissue.…”

“…Among these factors, the qualitative and quantitative changes in nuclear or mitochondrial DNA have been frequently reported in human cancers262728293031, and the interplay between them may partly participate in the tumor-related process39. Previous studies have reported reduced levels of mtDNA transcripts and increased mtDNA copy number in brain and lung with ageing4041.…”

Mitochondrial DNA copy number is associated with risk of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in Chinese population

“…So far, six studies have discussed the association between mtDNA copy number and head and neck cancer (HNC) risk , but results were inconsistent. For example, Lin et al.…”